Treffer: Convergent effects of peptides on the initiation of feeding motor programs in the mollusk Aplysia.
Original Publication: Washington [etc.]
Neurosignals. 2004 Jan-Apr;13(1-2):70-86. (PMID: 15004426)
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Dec;29:48-56. (PMID: 24907657)
J Neurosci. 1993 Aug;13(8):3252-65. (PMID: 8340806)
Peptides. 1991 Jul-Aug;12(4):683-90. (PMID: 1788132)
J Comp Physiol A. 1993 Nov;173(5):519-36. (PMID: 8263840)
J Neurosci. 2018 Jul 18;38(29):6475-6490. (PMID: 29934354)
J Neurosci Methods. 2024 Apr;404:110077. (PMID: 38336092)
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jan;87(1):49-61. (PMID: 11784729)
Elife. 2021 Jun 30;10:. (PMID: 34190043)
Behav Biol. 1974 Jan;10(1):1-26. (PMID: 4815142)
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3711-27. (PMID: 19846618)
Physiology (Bethesda). 2011 Dec;26(6):393-411. (PMID: 22170958)
Neuron. 2012 Oct 4;76(1):82-97. (PMID: 23040808)
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Apr;89(4):2120-36. (PMID: 12686581)
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Oct 1;116(4):1821-1830. (PMID: 27466134)
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Oct;21(5):685-92. (PMID: 21646013)
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;103(4):2174-84. (PMID: 20181731)
Curr Biol. 2005 Oct 11;15(19):1712-21. (PMID: 16213817)
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014 Apr 24;5:58. (PMID: 24795698)
Behav Neural Biol. 1994 Nov;62(3):210-23. (PMID: 7857243)
J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 28;27(13):3490-502. (PMID: 17392465)
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jul 8;41:475-499. (PMID: 29709210)
J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 15;20(18):6752-9. (PMID: 10995818)
J Comp Physiol A. 1993 Feb;172(1):17-32. (PMID: 8445578)
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016 Dec;41:1-7. (PMID: 27450880)
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):814-30. (PMID: 18032563)
Neuron. 2021 May 19;109(10):1600-1620. (PMID: 33705708)
J Neural Eng. 2021 Dec 14;18(6):. (PMID: 34826825)
Neuron. 2012 Oct 4;76(1):1-11. (PMID: 23040802)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 22;101(25):9447-52. (PMID: 15197252)
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Jun;31(11):2073-85. (PMID: 20529118)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Feb;87(3):933-7. (PMID: 2153979)
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Apr;75(4):1309-26. (PMID: 8727380)
Cell. 2013 Oct 10;155(2):482-482.e1. (PMID: 24120143)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5483-6. (PMID: 3474664)
Neuroscience. 2010 Apr 28;167(1):11-20. (PMID: 20149847)
Elife. 2018 Aug 02;7:. (PMID: 30070205)
J Neurophysiol. 2023 Oct 1;130(4):941-952. (PMID: 37671445)
Neuron. 2011 Dec 22;72(6):899-911. (PMID: 22196327)
Behav Neural Biol. 1987 Sep;48(2):222-36. (PMID: 3675517)
J Neurosci. 2021 Jan 27;41(4):630-647. (PMID: 33239399)
Curr Biol. 2009 Jun 23;19(12):975-84. (PMID: 19500988)
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;86(2):1057-61. (PMID: 11495975)
Nature. 2000 Apr 6;404(6778):661-71. (PMID: 10766253)
Elife. 2021 May 27;10:. (PMID: 34042587)
J Neurosci. 1991 Nov;11(11):3630-55. (PMID: 1941100)
J Neurosci. 1989 May;9(5):1562-78. (PMID: 2723741)
J Neurosci. 2015 Apr 22;35(16):6326-34. (PMID: 25904786)
J Neurosci. 1992 Mar;12(3):810-7. (PMID: 1347561)
Bioessays. 2012 Jun;34(6):458-65. (PMID: 22396302)
Brain Res. 1982 Jun 10;241(2):334-7. (PMID: 7104716)
Front Neural Circuits. 2023 Jun 09;17:1200902. (PMID: 37361713)
J Neurosci. 2001 Jun 1;21(11):4050-8. (PMID: 11356892)
J Neurosci. 2021 Sep 22;41(38):7978-7990. (PMID: 34380765)
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 21;9(1):9058. (PMID: 31227744)
Learn Mem. 2013 May 16;20(6):318-27. (PMID: 23685764)
Nature. 1983 Dec 22-1984 Jan 4;306(5945):784-5. (PMID: 6318118)
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Sep;78(3):1305-19. (PMID: 9310422)
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 19;6(4):e18745. (PMID: 21526173)
J Neurophysiol. 1978 Jan;41(1):157-80. (PMID: 202682)
J Neurophysiol. 1979 May;42(3):791-803. (PMID: 219163)
eNeuro. 2021 Nov 9;8(6):. (PMID: 34593519)
J Neurosci. 2023 Feb 15;43(7):1089-1110. (PMID: 36599680)
Endocrinology. 2004 Jun;145(6):2660-5. (PMID: 15044353)
J Neurophysiol. 1978 Jan;41(1):181-203. (PMID: 621542)
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2008 Dec 10;164(1-2):96-104. (PMID: 18602029)
Curr Biol. 2014 May 5;24(9):941-50. (PMID: 24704077)
J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 25;35(12):5051-66. (PMID: 25810534)
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Jun 1;127(6):1445-1459. (PMID: 35507477)
J Neurosci. 1990 Oct;10(10):3194-207. (PMID: 1698940)
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Dec;90(6):3783-93. (PMID: 12930819)
J Comput Neurosci. 2016 Apr;40(2):113-35. (PMID: 26798029)
J Neurophysiol. 2002 May;87(5):2307-23. (PMID: 11976370)
Elife. 2014 Aug 05;3:e02812. (PMID: 25097248)
J Neurosci. 2007 Jul 25;27(30):8059-70. (PMID: 17652597)
Weitere Informationen
Neuropeptides configure the feeding network of Aplysia. For example, egestive activity is promoted by small cardioactive peptide (SCP), and ingestive activity is promoted by a combination of feeding circuit activating peptide (FCAP) and cerebral peptide 2 (CP-2). In addition, SCP and FCAP/CP-2 have a common network effect that does not contribute to motor program specification. They increase the excitability of an interneuron, B63. In this report, we further characterized the effects of peptides on B63. We performed voltage-clamp experiments and used a step protocol to look at steady-state currents. We found that SCP and FCAP/CP-2 both induced an inward current that was virtually absent in low-sodium saline. Previous work has established that B63 is unusual in the feeding circuit in that subthreshold depolarizations are autonomously generated that can trigger motor programs. Here, we show that this autonomous activity is more frequent in the presence of peptides. Previous studies have also shown that activity of the feeding central pattern generator (CPG) can be initiated by neurons that excite B63, e.g., by cerebral buccal interneuron 2 (CBI-2), a projection neuron that triggers biting-like motor programs. Here, we show that the latency of CBI-2-induced activity is decreased by stimulation of the esophageal nerve (EN) (which releases endogenous SCP). These results, taken together with previous results, indicate that peptides that act divergently to configure network activity additionally act convergently to promote motor program induction. We present data that suggest that this arrangement facilitates brief switches between ingestive and egestive motor activity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The activity of most networks is affected by multiple neuromodulators. Studies that have sought to determine why this is the case have focused on how the effects of one modulator differ from those of another (how modulators uniquely determine motor output). This study differs in that we ask why a convergent (common) network modification is important. We show that it can promote program induction and present data that suggest this may have consequences for task switching.