*Result*: 'SOMS BrainSpace': A digital serious game for undergraduate neuroscience.
Title:
'SOMS BrainSpace': A digital serious game for undergraduate neuroscience.
Authors:
Tran A; School of Medical Sciences (Education Innovation), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia., Huang JY; School of Medical Sciences (Education Innovation), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia., Campbell CR; School of Medical Sciences (Education Innovation), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia., Hegedus EM; School of Medical Sciences (Education Innovation), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Source:
Anatomical sciences education [Anat Sci Educ] 2025 Jun 27. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Jun 27.
Publication Model:
Ahead of Print
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101392205 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1935-9780 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19359772 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Anat Sci Educ Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Original Publication: Hoboken, N.J. : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
References:
Jozefowicz RF. Neurophobia: the fear of neurology among medical students. Arch Neurol. 1994;51(4):328–329.
Jukna Š, Puteikis K, Mameniškienė R. Perception of neurology among undergraduate medical students—what can be done to counter neurophobia during clinical studies? BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):447.
Rodrigues AN, Sousa TS, Marvão MC, Sena DS, Koshimoto BH, Silva SC, et al. Education research: monitoring and tracking neurophobia: evidence from a temporal analysis of Brazilian medical schools. Neurol Educ. 2023;2(3):e200076.
Plass JL, Homer BD, Kinzer CK. Foundations of game‐based learning. Educ Psychol. 2015;50(4):258–283.
Arias‐Calderón M, Castro J, Gayol S. Serious games as a method for enhancing learning engagement: student perception on online higher education during COVID‐19. Front Psychol. 2022;13:889975.
See C, Pawlina W, Chan LK. Gamification in anatomy education. Teaching anatomy. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG; 2020. p. 63–71.
Susi T, Johannesson M, Backlund P. Serious games—an overview. Technical Report HS‐ IKI ‐TR‐07‐001. Sweden: School of Humanities and Informatics, University of Skövde; 2007.
Chiang TH, Yang SJ, Hwang G‐J. An augmented reality‐based mobile learning system to improve students' learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. J Educ Technol Soc. 2014;17(4):352–365.
Souza V, Maciel A, Nedel L, Kopper R, Loges K, Schlemmer E. VR neuro game: a virtual reality game to support neuroanatomy teaching and learning. J Interact Syst. 2021;12(1):253–268.
Gurses ME, Hanalioglu S, Mignucci‐Jiménez G, Gökalp E, Gonzalez‐Romo NI, Gungor A, et al. Three‐dimensional modeling and extended reality simulations of the cross‐sectional anatomy of the cerebrum, cerebellum, and brainstem. Oper Neurosurg. 2023;25(1):3–10.
Krokos E, Plaisant C, Varshney A. Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall. Virtual Reality. 2019;23(1):1–15.
Sattar MU, Palaniappan S, Lokman A, Hassan A, Shah N, Riaz Z. Effects of virtual reality training on medical students' learning motivation and competency. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(3):852–857.
Gloy K, Weyhe P, Nerenz E, Kaluschke M, Uslar V, Zachmann G, et al. Immersive anatomy atlas: learning factual medical knowledge in a virtual reality environment. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(2):360–368.
Newman HJ, Meyer AJ, Carr SE. Neuroanatomy teaching in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. World Neurosurg. 2021;149:e217–e224.
Samadbeik M, Yaaghobi D, Bastani P, Abhari S, Rezaee R, Garavand A. The applications of virtual reality technology in medical groups teaching. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018;6(3):123.
McBride JM, Drake RL. National survey on anatomical sciences in medical education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(1):7–14.
Moro C, McLean M. Supporting students' transition to university and problem‐based learning. Med Sci Educ. 2017;27:353–361.
Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(6):253–259.
Drake SM. Creating integrated curriculum: proven ways to increase student learning. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Corwin Press; 1998.
Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(2):104–107.
Craig S, Tait N, Boers D, McAndrew D. Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80(4):212–216.
Trautman J, McAndrew D, Craig SJ. Anatomy teaching stuck in time? A 10‐year follow‐up of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. Aust J Educ. 2019;63(3):340–350.
Trullàs JC, Blay C, Sarri E, Pujol R. Effectiveness of problem‐based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):104.
Bergman EM, De Bruin AB, Herrler A, Verheijen IW, Scherpbier AJ, Van Der Vleuten CP. Students' perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem‐based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:1–11.
Triepels CPR, Koppes DM, Van Kuijk SMJ, Popeijus HE, Lamers WH, van Gorp T, et al. Medical students' perspective on training in anatomy. Ann Anat. 2018;217:60–65.
Sotgiu MA, Mazzarello V, Bandiera P, Madeddu R, Montella A, Moxham B. Neuroanatomy, the Achille's heel of medical students. A systematic analysis of educational strategies for the teaching of neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(1):107–116.
Bolino G, Fineschi V, Cecannecchia C, D'Antonio G, Frati P. The practice of teaching and scientific research on cadaveric material remains crucial for medical education. Clin Pract. 2023;13(5):1073–1081.
Habicht JL, Kiessling C, Winkelmann A. Bodies for anatomy education in medical schools: an overview of the sources of cadavers worldwide. Acad Med. 2018;93(9):1293–1300.
Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat. 2016;208:151–157.
Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):549–559.
Edwards‐Bailey A, Ktayen H, Solomou G, Bligh E, Boyle A, Gharooni A‐A, et al. A survey of teaching undergraduate neuroanatomy in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Br J Neurosurg. 2022;36(1):52–57.
Neuwirth LS, Dacius TF Jr, Mukherji BR. Teaching neuroanatomy through a historical context. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2018;16(2):E26.
Arantes M, Barbosa JM, Ferreira MA. Neuroanatomy education: the impact on perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of an intensive course on general practice residents. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(5):465–474.
Lopez M, Arriaga JGC, Álvarez JPN, González RT, Elizondo‐Leal JA, Valdez‐García JE, et al. Virtual reality vs traditional education: is there any advantage in human neuroanatomy teaching? Comput Electr Eng. 2021;93:107282.
Punja R, Punja D. Enhancing the effectiveness of teaching neuroanatomy: a comparative study using stained and unstained brain sections to interpret cross sectional neuroanatomy. Transl Res Anat. 2024;37:100358.
Henssen DJ, van den Heuvel L, De Jong G, Vorstenbosch MA, van Cappellen van Walsum AM, Van den Hurk MM, et al. Neuroanatomy learning: augmented reality vs. cross‐sections. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):353–365.
Levinson AJ, Weaver B, Garside S, McGinn H, Norman GR. Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e‐learning instructional designs. Med Educ. 2007;41(5):495–501.
Allen LK, Eagleson R, de Ribaupierre S. Evaluation of an online three‐dimensional interactive resource for undergraduate neuroanatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):431–439.
Svirko E, Mellanby J. Teaching neuroanatomy using computer‐aided learning: what makes for successful outcomes? Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):560–569.
Shadiev R, Hwang WY, Huang YM, Liu TY. The impact of supported and annotated mobile learning on achievement and cognitive load. Educ Technol Soc. 2015;18(4):53–69.
Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci. 1988;12(2):257–285.
Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn Instr. 1994;4(4):295–312.
Lawrence C, editor. Take a load off: cognitive considerations for game design. Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian conference on Interactive entertainment. 2006.
Sweller J. Cognitive load theory. Psychology of learning and motivation. Volume 55. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2011. p. 37–76.
Abulaban AA, Obeid TH, Algahtani HA, Kojan SM, Al‐Khathaami AM, Abulaban AA, et al. Neurophobia among medical students. Neurosci J. 2015;20(1):37–40.
Hazelton L. Changing concepts of neuroanatomy teaching in medical education. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23(4):359–364.
D'Eon MF. Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:1–6.
Mateen FJ, D'Eon MF. Neuroanatomy: a single institution study of knowledge loss. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):537–539.
Neumeier M, Narnaware Y. Evaluating knowledge loss over multiple retention intervals can identify deficiencies and inform curricular development. Anat Sci Educ. 2024;17(2):337–342.
Venter G, Lubbe JC, Bosman MC. Neurophobia: a side effect of neuroanatomy education? J Med Syst. 2022;46(12):99.
Abushouk AI, Duc NM. Curing neurophobia in medical schools: evidence‐based strategies. Med Educ Online. 2016;21(1):32476.
Javaid MA, Chakraborty S, Cryan JF, Schellekens H, Toulouse A. Understanding neurophobia: reasons behind impaired understanding and learning of neuroanatomy in cross‐disciplinary healthcare students. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(1):81–93.
Yeung A, Karimi L, Wijeratne T. Neurophobia: a study of Australian medical students and junior doctors. medRxiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.21.21252144.
Arantes M, Andrade JP, Barbosa J, Ferreira MA. Curricular changes: the impact on medical students knowledge of neuroanatomy. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:1–6.
Said CS, Shamsudin K, Mailok R, Johan R, Hanaif HF. The development and evaluation of a 3D visualization tool in anatomy education. EDUCATUM J Sci Math Technol. 2015;2(2):48–56.
Cheung CC, Bridges SM, Tipoe GL. Why is anatomy difficult to learn? The implications for undergraduate medical curricula. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(6):752–763.
Ma M, Zheng H. Virtual reality and serious games in healthcare. Advanced computational intelligence paradigms in healthcare 6 Virtual reality in psychotherapy, rehabilitation, and assessment. Berlin, Heidelberg, DE: Springer, 2011. p. 169–192.
Khalil MK, Mansour MM, Wilhite DR. Evaluation of cognitive loads imposed by traditional paper‐based and innovative computer‐based instructional strategies. J Vet Med Educ. 2010;37(4):353–357.
Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R. “Let's get physical”: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):216–224.
Küçük S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):411–421.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self‐determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well‐being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.
Ryan RM, Rigby CS, Przybylski A. The motivational pull of video games: a self‐determination theory approach. Motiv Emot. 2006;30:344–360.
Moro C, Phelps C, Birt J. Improving serious games by crowdsourcing feedback from the STEAM online gaming community. Internet High Educ. 2022;55:100874.
Caillois R. Man, play, and games: Translated from the French by Meyer Barash. Champaign, IL, USA: University of Illinois Press; 2001.
Csikszentmihalyi M. Toward a psychology of optimal experience. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: the collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Dordrecht, SA: Springer, 2014. p. 209–226.
da Conceição KR, Lemos RR, Fiuza PJ, Cechinel C, Rudolph CM. A serious game for the cardiovascular system anatomy: a case study of the performance effects on health sciences students. Int J Innov Educ Res. 2019;7:115–128.
Souza AD, Punja D, Prabhath S, Pandey AK. Influence of pretesting and a near peer sharing real life experiences on CPR training outcomes in first year medical students: a non‐randomized quasi‐experimental study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):434.
Stepan K, Zeiger J, Hanchuk S, Del Signore A, Shrivastava R, Govindaraj S, et al. Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(10):1006–1013.
Dimitriadou A, Djafarova N, Turetken O, Verkuyl M, Ferworn A. Challenges in serious game design and development: educators' experiences. Simul Gaming. 2021;52(2):132–152.
Olszewski AE, Wolbrink TA. Serious gaming in medical education: a proposed structured framework for game development. Simul Healthc. 2017;12(4):240–253.
Zapalska A, Brozik D, Rudd D. Development of active learning with simulations and games. Online Submission 2012.
Hilliard A, Kargbo HF. Educationally game‐based learning encourages learners to Be actively engaged in their own learning. Int J Educ Pract. 2017;5(4):45–60.
Bada SO. Constructivism learning theory: a paradigm for teaching and learning. J Res Method Educ. 2015;5(6):66–70.
Von Glasersfeld E. Introduction: aspects of constructivism. Constructivism: theory, perspectives, and practice. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press; 1996. p. 3–7.
Hoque ME. Three domains of learning: cognitive, affective and psychomotor. J EFL Educ Res. 2016;2(2):45–52.
Chou Y‐k. Actionable gamification: beyond points, badges, and leaderboards. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd; 2019.
Matos PF. Gamification—the power of motivation using octalysis framework. 2018.
Marisa F, Ahmad SSS, Yusoh ZIM, Maukar AL, Marcus RD, Widodo AA. Evaluation of student core drives on e‐learning during the Covid‐19 with octalysis gamification framework. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2020;11(11):104–116.
Vygotskiĭ LS. The collected works of LS Vygotsky: the history of the development of higher mental functions. Berlin, Heidelberg, DE: Springer Science & Business Media; 1997.
Vygotsky LS, Cole M. Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press; 1978.
Sannino A. The principle of double stimulation: a path to volitional action. Learn Cult Soc Interact. 2015;6:1–15.
Engeström Y, Nuttall J, Hopwood N. Transformative agency by double stimulation: advances in theory and methodology. Pedagog Cult Soc. 2022;30(1):1–7.
Thorne SL. Mediated life activity, double stimulation, and the question of agency. Learn Cult Soc Interact. 2015;4:62–66.
Yang H. Epistemic agency, a double‐stimulation, and video‐based learning: a formative intervention study in language teacher education. System. 2021;96:102401.
Morselli D, Sannino A. Testing the model of double stimulation in a change laboratory. Teach Teach Educ. 2021;97:103224.
Romero M, Barma S. Analysing an interactive problem‐solving task through the lens of double stimulation. Can J Learn Technol. 2022;48(1):1–23.
Mishra L, Gupta T, Shree A. Online teaching‐learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID‐19 pandemic. Int J Edu Res Open. 2020;1:100012.
Obrero‐Gaitán E, Nieto‐Escamez FA, Zagalaz‐Anula N, Cortés‐Pérez I. An innovative approach for online neuroanatomy and Neurorrehabilitation teaching based on 3D virtual anatomical models using leap motion controller during COVID‐19 pandemic. Front Psychol. 2021;12:590196.
Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, Guàrdia L, Koole M. Online university teaching during and after the Covid‐19 crisis: refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Sci Educ. 2020;2:923–945.
Baxter G, Hainey T. Student perceptions of virtual reality use in higher education. J Appl Res High Educ. 2019;12(3):413–424.
Wu HK, Lee SWY, Chang HY, Liang JC. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput Educ. 2013;62:41–49.
Velev D, Zlateva P. Virtual reality challenges in education and training. Int J Learn. 2017;3(1):33–37.
Elliott R. The demographics of student device ownership. Educ Technol Soc. 2023;26(3):129–140.
Maatuk AM, Elberkawi EK, Aljawarneh S, Rashaideh H, Alharbi H. The COVID‐19 pandemic and E‐learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. J Comput High Educ. 2022;34(1):21–38.
McMillion M. How does structured‐light 3D scanning work. 2022. Available from: https://www.artec3d.com/learning‐center/structured‐light‐3d‐scanning.
Viudes‐Carbonell SJ, Gallego‐Durán FJ, Llorens‐Largo F, Molina‐Carmona R. Towards an iterative design for serious games. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3290.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
MacFarland TW, Yates JM, MacFarland TW, Yates JM. Mann–Whitney U test. Introduction to nonparametric statistics for the biological sciences using R. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 103–132.
Hart A. Mann–Whitney test is not just a test of medians: differences in spread can be important. BMJ. 2001;323(7309):391–393.
Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
Kam K‐q, Tan G, Tan K, Lim E, Koh NY, Tan N. Neurophobia in medical students and junior doctors—blame the GIK. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2013;42(11):559–566.
Chhetri SK. E‐learning in neurology education: principles, opportunities and challenges in combating neurophobia. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;44:80–83.
Jao CS, Brint SU, Hier DB. Making the neurology clerkship more effective: can e‐textbook facilitate learning? Neurol Res. 2005;27(7):762–767.
Vergara D, Antón‐Sancho Á, Dávila LP, Fernández‐Arias P. Virtual reality as a didactic resource from the perspective of engineering teachers. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2022;30(4):1086–1101.
Kozma RB. Learning with media. Rev Educ Res. 1991;61(2):179–211.
Haque A, Shafi R, Faisal T, Naseem S, Ambreen S, Rafi A. Effect on academic performance by learning online through 3d anatomy atlas versus 2d presentations. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2021;71(5):1700–1704.
Ruisoto P, Juanes JA, Contador I, Mayoral P, Prats‐Galino A. Experimental evidence for improved neuroimaging interpretation using three‐dimensional graphic models. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(3):132–137.
Abuhamdeh S, Csikszentmihalyi M. The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivated, goal‐directed activities. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2012;38(3):317–330.
Prensky M. Fun, play and games: what makes games engaging. Digital Game‐Based Learning. 2001;5(1):5–31.
Hwang GJ, Chen CH. Influences of an inquiry‐based ubiquitous gaming design on students' learning achievements, motivation, behavioral patterns, and tendency towards critical thinking and problem solving. Br J Educ Technol. 2017;48(4):950–971.
Hamari J, Shernoff DJ, Rowe E, Coller B, Asbell‐Clarke J, Edwards T. Challenging games help students learn: an empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game‐based learning. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;54:170–179.
Rueff‐Barroso CR, Cazagrande GS, Sampaio MAP, Fazan VPS. The “anatomy colored cards game”: an alternative, inexpensive and accessible teaching tool for anatomy students. J Educ Res Rev. 2019;7(8):175–182.
Dall R, Abbott D, Rea PM, Varsou O. A serious game on skull anatomy for dental undergraduates. Biomed Vis. 2020;7:217–237.
Svirko E, Mellanby J. Attitudes to e‐learning, learning style and achievement in learning neuroanatomy by medical students. Med Teach. 2008;30(9–10):e219–e227.
McKeough DM, Bagatell N. Attitudes of health care students about computer‐aided neuroanatomy instruction. J Allied Health. 2009;38(4):189–195.
Rondon S, Sassi FC, Furquim de Andrade CR. Computer game‐based and traditional learning method: a comparison regarding students' knowledge retention. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:1–8.
von Keyserlingk L, Yamaguchi‐Pedroza K, Arum R, Eccles JS. Stress of university students before and after campus closure in response to COVID‐19. J Community Psychol. 2022;50(1):285–301.
Moroz S, Andrade R, Walsh L, Richard CL. Student performance on an objective structured clinical exam delivered both virtually and in‐person. Am J Pharm Educ. 2023;87(7):100088.
Kendell A, Limback K, Lester DK, Rogers RS, Creamer BA, Dennis JF. Student perceptions of remote versus on‐campus gross anatomy laboratories during COVID‐19. Anat Sci Educ. 2023;16(6):1174–1186.
Nathaniel TI, Black AC. An adaptive blended learning approach in the implementation of a medical neuroscience laboratory activities. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31:733–743.
Whillier S, Lystad RP. The effect of face‐to‐face teaching on student knowledge and satisfaction in an undergraduate neuroanatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):239–245.
Li J, Che W. Challenges and coping strategies of online learning for college students in the context of COVID‐19: a survey of Chinese universities. Sustain Cities Soc. 2022;83:103958.
Pick LT, McCartan C, Fee K, Hermon J, editors. The experiences of students transitioning back to in‐person learning post‐Covid‐19. 50th Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education. Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya; 2022.
Richards S. Faculty perception of student engagement in online anatomy laboratory courses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Med Sci Educ. 2023;33(2):465–480.
Engeström Y. From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory Psychol. 2011;21(5):598–628.
Hopwood N, Dahlberg J, Blomberg M, Abrandt Dahlgren M. Double stimulation in healthcare emergencies: fostering expansive, collective tool use through simulation‐based continuing professional education. Pedagog Cult Soc. 2022;30(1):71–87.
Farley H, Murphy A, Johnson C, Carter B, Lane M, Midgley W, et al. How do students use their mobile devices to support learning? A case study from an Australian regional university. J Interact Media Educ. 2015;2015(1):1–13.
Cham K, Edwards M‐L, Kruesi L, Celeste T, Hennessey T. Digital preferences and perceptions of students in health professional courses at a leading Australian university: a baseline for improving digital skills and competencies in health graduates. Australas J Educ Technol. 2022;38(1):69–86.
Choi‐Lundberg DL, Low TF, Patman P, Turner P, Sinha SN. Medical student preferences for self‐directed study resources in gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(2):150–160.
Torun ED. Online distance learning in higher education: E‐learning readiness as a predictor of academic achievement. Open Praxis. 2020;12(2):191–208.
Ben Awadh A, Clark J, Clowry G, Keenan ID. Multimodal three‐dimensional visualization enhances novice learner interpretation of basic cross‐sectional anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(1):127–142.
Kraut AS, Omron R, Caretta‐Weyer H, Jordan J, Manthey D, Wolf SJ, et al. The flipped classroom: a critical appraisal. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(3):527–536.
Mu S, Hu J, Liu F, Zhao C, Sun Y. New innovations and educational process in undergraduate neurology education in blended learning. Postgrad Med. 2023;135(6):551–561.
Shivaraju PT, Manu G, Vinaya M, Savkar MK. Evaluating the effectiveness of pre‐ and post‐test model of learning in a medical school. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;7(9):947–951.
Witmer BG, Jerome CJ, Singer MJ. The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence. 2005;14(3):298–312.
Vuchkova J, Maybury TS, Farah CS. Testing the educational potential of 3D visualization software in oral radiographic interpretation. J Dent Educ. 2011;75(11):1417–1425.
Khatamian Far P. Challenges of recruitment and retention of university students as research participants: lessons learned from a pilot study. J Aust Libr Inf Assoc. 2018;67(3):278–292.
Fugard AJB, Potts HWW. Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2015;18(6):669–684.
Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18(2):179–183.
Cunningham L, Murphy O. Embracing the universal design for learning framework in digital game based learning—a set of game design principles. Transforming our world through design, diversity and education. Amsterdam, NL: IOS Press; 2018. p. 409–420.
Jukna Š, Puteikis K, Mameniškienė R. Perception of neurology among undergraduate medical students—what can be done to counter neurophobia during clinical studies? BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):447.
Rodrigues AN, Sousa TS, Marvão MC, Sena DS, Koshimoto BH, Silva SC, et al. Education research: monitoring and tracking neurophobia: evidence from a temporal analysis of Brazilian medical schools. Neurol Educ. 2023;2(3):e200076.
Plass JL, Homer BD, Kinzer CK. Foundations of game‐based learning. Educ Psychol. 2015;50(4):258–283.
Arias‐Calderón M, Castro J, Gayol S. Serious games as a method for enhancing learning engagement: student perception on online higher education during COVID‐19. Front Psychol. 2022;13:889975.
See C, Pawlina W, Chan LK. Gamification in anatomy education. Teaching anatomy. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG; 2020. p. 63–71.
Susi T, Johannesson M, Backlund P. Serious games—an overview. Technical Report HS‐ IKI ‐TR‐07‐001. Sweden: School of Humanities and Informatics, University of Skövde; 2007.
Chiang TH, Yang SJ, Hwang G‐J. An augmented reality‐based mobile learning system to improve students' learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. J Educ Technol Soc. 2014;17(4):352–365.
Souza V, Maciel A, Nedel L, Kopper R, Loges K, Schlemmer E. VR neuro game: a virtual reality game to support neuroanatomy teaching and learning. J Interact Syst. 2021;12(1):253–268.
Gurses ME, Hanalioglu S, Mignucci‐Jiménez G, Gökalp E, Gonzalez‐Romo NI, Gungor A, et al. Three‐dimensional modeling and extended reality simulations of the cross‐sectional anatomy of the cerebrum, cerebellum, and brainstem. Oper Neurosurg. 2023;25(1):3–10.
Krokos E, Plaisant C, Varshney A. Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall. Virtual Reality. 2019;23(1):1–15.
Sattar MU, Palaniappan S, Lokman A, Hassan A, Shah N, Riaz Z. Effects of virtual reality training on medical students' learning motivation and competency. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(3):852–857.
Gloy K, Weyhe P, Nerenz E, Kaluschke M, Uslar V, Zachmann G, et al. Immersive anatomy atlas: learning factual medical knowledge in a virtual reality environment. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(2):360–368.
Newman HJ, Meyer AJ, Carr SE. Neuroanatomy teaching in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. World Neurosurg. 2021;149:e217–e224.
Samadbeik M, Yaaghobi D, Bastani P, Abhari S, Rezaee R, Garavand A. The applications of virtual reality technology in medical groups teaching. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018;6(3):123.
McBride JM, Drake RL. National survey on anatomical sciences in medical education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(1):7–14.
Moro C, McLean M. Supporting students' transition to university and problem‐based learning. Med Sci Educ. 2017;27:353–361.
Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2(6):253–259.
Drake SM. Creating integrated curriculum: proven ways to increase student learning. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Corwin Press; 1998.
Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(2):104–107.
Craig S, Tait N, Boers D, McAndrew D. Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80(4):212–216.
Trautman J, McAndrew D, Craig SJ. Anatomy teaching stuck in time? A 10‐year follow‐up of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. Aust J Educ. 2019;63(3):340–350.
Trullàs JC, Blay C, Sarri E, Pujol R. Effectiveness of problem‐based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):104.
Bergman EM, De Bruin AB, Herrler A, Verheijen IW, Scherpbier AJ, Van Der Vleuten CP. Students' perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem‐based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:1–11.
Triepels CPR, Koppes DM, Van Kuijk SMJ, Popeijus HE, Lamers WH, van Gorp T, et al. Medical students' perspective on training in anatomy. Ann Anat. 2018;217:60–65.
Sotgiu MA, Mazzarello V, Bandiera P, Madeddu R, Montella A, Moxham B. Neuroanatomy, the Achille's heel of medical students. A systematic analysis of educational strategies for the teaching of neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(1):107–116.
Bolino G, Fineschi V, Cecannecchia C, D'Antonio G, Frati P. The practice of teaching and scientific research on cadaveric material remains crucial for medical education. Clin Pract. 2023;13(5):1073–1081.
Habicht JL, Kiessling C, Winkelmann A. Bodies for anatomy education in medical schools: an overview of the sources of cadavers worldwide. Acad Med. 2018;93(9):1293–1300.
Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat. 2016;208:151–157.
Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):549–559.
Edwards‐Bailey A, Ktayen H, Solomou G, Bligh E, Boyle A, Gharooni A‐A, et al. A survey of teaching undergraduate neuroanatomy in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Br J Neurosurg. 2022;36(1):52–57.
Neuwirth LS, Dacius TF Jr, Mukherji BR. Teaching neuroanatomy through a historical context. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2018;16(2):E26.
Arantes M, Barbosa JM, Ferreira MA. Neuroanatomy education: the impact on perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of an intensive course on general practice residents. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(5):465–474.
Lopez M, Arriaga JGC, Álvarez JPN, González RT, Elizondo‐Leal JA, Valdez‐García JE, et al. Virtual reality vs traditional education: is there any advantage in human neuroanatomy teaching? Comput Electr Eng. 2021;93:107282.
Punja R, Punja D. Enhancing the effectiveness of teaching neuroanatomy: a comparative study using stained and unstained brain sections to interpret cross sectional neuroanatomy. Transl Res Anat. 2024;37:100358.
Henssen DJ, van den Heuvel L, De Jong G, Vorstenbosch MA, van Cappellen van Walsum AM, Van den Hurk MM, et al. Neuroanatomy learning: augmented reality vs. cross‐sections. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):353–365.
Levinson AJ, Weaver B, Garside S, McGinn H, Norman GR. Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e‐learning instructional designs. Med Educ. 2007;41(5):495–501.
Allen LK, Eagleson R, de Ribaupierre S. Evaluation of an online three‐dimensional interactive resource for undergraduate neuroanatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):431–439.
Svirko E, Mellanby J. Teaching neuroanatomy using computer‐aided learning: what makes for successful outcomes? Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(6):560–569.
Shadiev R, Hwang WY, Huang YM, Liu TY. The impact of supported and annotated mobile learning on achievement and cognitive load. Educ Technol Soc. 2015;18(4):53–69.
Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci. 1988;12(2):257–285.
Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn Instr. 1994;4(4):295–312.
Lawrence C, editor. Take a load off: cognitive considerations for game design. Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian conference on Interactive entertainment. 2006.
Sweller J. Cognitive load theory. Psychology of learning and motivation. Volume 55. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2011. p. 37–76.
Abulaban AA, Obeid TH, Algahtani HA, Kojan SM, Al‐Khathaami AM, Abulaban AA, et al. Neurophobia among medical students. Neurosci J. 2015;20(1):37–40.
Hazelton L. Changing concepts of neuroanatomy teaching in medical education. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23(4):359–364.
D'Eon MF. Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:1–6.
Mateen FJ, D'Eon MF. Neuroanatomy: a single institution study of knowledge loss. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):537–539.
Neumeier M, Narnaware Y. Evaluating knowledge loss over multiple retention intervals can identify deficiencies and inform curricular development. Anat Sci Educ. 2024;17(2):337–342.
Venter G, Lubbe JC, Bosman MC. Neurophobia: a side effect of neuroanatomy education? J Med Syst. 2022;46(12):99.
Abushouk AI, Duc NM. Curing neurophobia in medical schools: evidence‐based strategies. Med Educ Online. 2016;21(1):32476.
Javaid MA, Chakraborty S, Cryan JF, Schellekens H, Toulouse A. Understanding neurophobia: reasons behind impaired understanding and learning of neuroanatomy in cross‐disciplinary healthcare students. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(1):81–93.
Yeung A, Karimi L, Wijeratne T. Neurophobia: a study of Australian medical students and junior doctors. medRxiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.21.21252144.
Arantes M, Andrade JP, Barbosa J, Ferreira MA. Curricular changes: the impact on medical students knowledge of neuroanatomy. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:1–6.
Said CS, Shamsudin K, Mailok R, Johan R, Hanaif HF. The development and evaluation of a 3D visualization tool in anatomy education. EDUCATUM J Sci Math Technol. 2015;2(2):48–56.
Cheung CC, Bridges SM, Tipoe GL. Why is anatomy difficult to learn? The implications for undergraduate medical curricula. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(6):752–763.
Ma M, Zheng H. Virtual reality and serious games in healthcare. Advanced computational intelligence paradigms in healthcare 6 Virtual reality in psychotherapy, rehabilitation, and assessment. Berlin, Heidelberg, DE: Springer, 2011. p. 169–192.
Khalil MK, Mansour MM, Wilhite DR. Evaluation of cognitive loads imposed by traditional paper‐based and innovative computer‐based instructional strategies. J Vet Med Educ. 2010;37(4):353–357.
Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R. “Let's get physical”: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):216–224.
Küçük S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):411–421.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self‐determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well‐being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.
Ryan RM, Rigby CS, Przybylski A. The motivational pull of video games: a self‐determination theory approach. Motiv Emot. 2006;30:344–360.
Moro C, Phelps C, Birt J. Improving serious games by crowdsourcing feedback from the STEAM online gaming community. Internet High Educ. 2022;55:100874.
Caillois R. Man, play, and games: Translated from the French by Meyer Barash. Champaign, IL, USA: University of Illinois Press; 2001.
Csikszentmihalyi M. Toward a psychology of optimal experience. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: the collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Dordrecht, SA: Springer, 2014. p. 209–226.
da Conceição KR, Lemos RR, Fiuza PJ, Cechinel C, Rudolph CM. A serious game for the cardiovascular system anatomy: a case study of the performance effects on health sciences students. Int J Innov Educ Res. 2019;7:115–128.
Souza AD, Punja D, Prabhath S, Pandey AK. Influence of pretesting and a near peer sharing real life experiences on CPR training outcomes in first year medical students: a non‐randomized quasi‐experimental study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):434.
Stepan K, Zeiger J, Hanchuk S, Del Signore A, Shrivastava R, Govindaraj S, et al. Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(10):1006–1013.
Dimitriadou A, Djafarova N, Turetken O, Verkuyl M, Ferworn A. Challenges in serious game design and development: educators' experiences. Simul Gaming. 2021;52(2):132–152.
Olszewski AE, Wolbrink TA. Serious gaming in medical education: a proposed structured framework for game development. Simul Healthc. 2017;12(4):240–253.
Zapalska A, Brozik D, Rudd D. Development of active learning with simulations and games. Online Submission 2012.
Hilliard A, Kargbo HF. Educationally game‐based learning encourages learners to Be actively engaged in their own learning. Int J Educ Pract. 2017;5(4):45–60.
Bada SO. Constructivism learning theory: a paradigm for teaching and learning. J Res Method Educ. 2015;5(6):66–70.
Von Glasersfeld E. Introduction: aspects of constructivism. Constructivism: theory, perspectives, and practice. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press; 1996. p. 3–7.
Hoque ME. Three domains of learning: cognitive, affective and psychomotor. J EFL Educ Res. 2016;2(2):45–52.
Chou Y‐k. Actionable gamification: beyond points, badges, and leaderboards. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd; 2019.
Matos PF. Gamification—the power of motivation using octalysis framework. 2018.
Marisa F, Ahmad SSS, Yusoh ZIM, Maukar AL, Marcus RD, Widodo AA. Evaluation of student core drives on e‐learning during the Covid‐19 with octalysis gamification framework. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2020;11(11):104–116.
Vygotskiĭ LS. The collected works of LS Vygotsky: the history of the development of higher mental functions. Berlin, Heidelberg, DE: Springer Science & Business Media; 1997.
Vygotsky LS, Cole M. Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press; 1978.
Sannino A. The principle of double stimulation: a path to volitional action. Learn Cult Soc Interact. 2015;6:1–15.
Engeström Y, Nuttall J, Hopwood N. Transformative agency by double stimulation: advances in theory and methodology. Pedagog Cult Soc. 2022;30(1):1–7.
Thorne SL. Mediated life activity, double stimulation, and the question of agency. Learn Cult Soc Interact. 2015;4:62–66.
Yang H. Epistemic agency, a double‐stimulation, and video‐based learning: a formative intervention study in language teacher education. System. 2021;96:102401.
Morselli D, Sannino A. Testing the model of double stimulation in a change laboratory. Teach Teach Educ. 2021;97:103224.
Romero M, Barma S. Analysing an interactive problem‐solving task through the lens of double stimulation. Can J Learn Technol. 2022;48(1):1–23.
Mishra L, Gupta T, Shree A. Online teaching‐learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID‐19 pandemic. Int J Edu Res Open. 2020;1:100012.
Obrero‐Gaitán E, Nieto‐Escamez FA, Zagalaz‐Anula N, Cortés‐Pérez I. An innovative approach for online neuroanatomy and Neurorrehabilitation teaching based on 3D virtual anatomical models using leap motion controller during COVID‐19 pandemic. Front Psychol. 2021;12:590196.
Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, Guàrdia L, Koole M. Online university teaching during and after the Covid‐19 crisis: refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Sci Educ. 2020;2:923–945.
Baxter G, Hainey T. Student perceptions of virtual reality use in higher education. J Appl Res High Educ. 2019;12(3):413–424.
Wu HK, Lee SWY, Chang HY, Liang JC. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput Educ. 2013;62:41–49.
Velev D, Zlateva P. Virtual reality challenges in education and training. Int J Learn. 2017;3(1):33–37.
Elliott R. The demographics of student device ownership. Educ Technol Soc. 2023;26(3):129–140.
Maatuk AM, Elberkawi EK, Aljawarneh S, Rashaideh H, Alharbi H. The COVID‐19 pandemic and E‐learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. J Comput High Educ. 2022;34(1):21–38.
McMillion M. How does structured‐light 3D scanning work. 2022. Available from: https://www.artec3d.com/learning‐center/structured‐light‐3d‐scanning.
Viudes‐Carbonell SJ, Gallego‐Durán FJ, Llorens‐Largo F, Molina‐Carmona R. Towards an iterative design for serious games. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3290.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
MacFarland TW, Yates JM, MacFarland TW, Yates JM. Mann–Whitney U test. Introduction to nonparametric statistics for the biological sciences using R. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 103–132.
Hart A. Mann–Whitney test is not just a test of medians: differences in spread can be important. BMJ. 2001;323(7309):391–393.
Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
Kam K‐q, Tan G, Tan K, Lim E, Koh NY, Tan N. Neurophobia in medical students and junior doctors—blame the GIK. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2013;42(11):559–566.
Chhetri SK. E‐learning in neurology education: principles, opportunities and challenges in combating neurophobia. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;44:80–83.
Jao CS, Brint SU, Hier DB. Making the neurology clerkship more effective: can e‐textbook facilitate learning? Neurol Res. 2005;27(7):762–767.
Vergara D, Antón‐Sancho Á, Dávila LP, Fernández‐Arias P. Virtual reality as a didactic resource from the perspective of engineering teachers. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2022;30(4):1086–1101.
Kozma RB. Learning with media. Rev Educ Res. 1991;61(2):179–211.
Haque A, Shafi R, Faisal T, Naseem S, Ambreen S, Rafi A. Effect on academic performance by learning online through 3d anatomy atlas versus 2d presentations. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2021;71(5):1700–1704.
Ruisoto P, Juanes JA, Contador I, Mayoral P, Prats‐Galino A. Experimental evidence for improved neuroimaging interpretation using three‐dimensional graphic models. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(3):132–137.
Abuhamdeh S, Csikszentmihalyi M. The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivated, goal‐directed activities. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2012;38(3):317–330.
Prensky M. Fun, play and games: what makes games engaging. Digital Game‐Based Learning. 2001;5(1):5–31.
Hwang GJ, Chen CH. Influences of an inquiry‐based ubiquitous gaming design on students' learning achievements, motivation, behavioral patterns, and tendency towards critical thinking and problem solving. Br J Educ Technol. 2017;48(4):950–971.
Hamari J, Shernoff DJ, Rowe E, Coller B, Asbell‐Clarke J, Edwards T. Challenging games help students learn: an empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game‐based learning. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;54:170–179.
Rueff‐Barroso CR, Cazagrande GS, Sampaio MAP, Fazan VPS. The “anatomy colored cards game”: an alternative, inexpensive and accessible teaching tool for anatomy students. J Educ Res Rev. 2019;7(8):175–182.
Dall R, Abbott D, Rea PM, Varsou O. A serious game on skull anatomy for dental undergraduates. Biomed Vis. 2020;7:217–237.
Svirko E, Mellanby J. Attitudes to e‐learning, learning style and achievement in learning neuroanatomy by medical students. Med Teach. 2008;30(9–10):e219–e227.
McKeough DM, Bagatell N. Attitudes of health care students about computer‐aided neuroanatomy instruction. J Allied Health. 2009;38(4):189–195.
Rondon S, Sassi FC, Furquim de Andrade CR. Computer game‐based and traditional learning method: a comparison regarding students' knowledge retention. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:1–8.
von Keyserlingk L, Yamaguchi‐Pedroza K, Arum R, Eccles JS. Stress of university students before and after campus closure in response to COVID‐19. J Community Psychol. 2022;50(1):285–301.
Moroz S, Andrade R, Walsh L, Richard CL. Student performance on an objective structured clinical exam delivered both virtually and in‐person. Am J Pharm Educ. 2023;87(7):100088.
Kendell A, Limback K, Lester DK, Rogers RS, Creamer BA, Dennis JF. Student perceptions of remote versus on‐campus gross anatomy laboratories during COVID‐19. Anat Sci Educ. 2023;16(6):1174–1186.
Nathaniel TI, Black AC. An adaptive blended learning approach in the implementation of a medical neuroscience laboratory activities. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31:733–743.
Whillier S, Lystad RP. The effect of face‐to‐face teaching on student knowledge and satisfaction in an undergraduate neuroanatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):239–245.
Li J, Che W. Challenges and coping strategies of online learning for college students in the context of COVID‐19: a survey of Chinese universities. Sustain Cities Soc. 2022;83:103958.
Pick LT, McCartan C, Fee K, Hermon J, editors. The experiences of students transitioning back to in‐person learning post‐Covid‐19. 50th Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education. Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya; 2022.
Richards S. Faculty perception of student engagement in online anatomy laboratory courses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Med Sci Educ. 2023;33(2):465–480.
Engeström Y. From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory Psychol. 2011;21(5):598–628.
Hopwood N, Dahlberg J, Blomberg M, Abrandt Dahlgren M. Double stimulation in healthcare emergencies: fostering expansive, collective tool use through simulation‐based continuing professional education. Pedagog Cult Soc. 2022;30(1):71–87.
Farley H, Murphy A, Johnson C, Carter B, Lane M, Midgley W, et al. How do students use their mobile devices to support learning? A case study from an Australian regional university. J Interact Media Educ. 2015;2015(1):1–13.
Cham K, Edwards M‐L, Kruesi L, Celeste T, Hennessey T. Digital preferences and perceptions of students in health professional courses at a leading Australian university: a baseline for improving digital skills and competencies in health graduates. Australas J Educ Technol. 2022;38(1):69–86.
Choi‐Lundberg DL, Low TF, Patman P, Turner P, Sinha SN. Medical student preferences for self‐directed study resources in gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(2):150–160.
Torun ED. Online distance learning in higher education: E‐learning readiness as a predictor of academic achievement. Open Praxis. 2020;12(2):191–208.
Ben Awadh A, Clark J, Clowry G, Keenan ID. Multimodal three‐dimensional visualization enhances novice learner interpretation of basic cross‐sectional anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(1):127–142.
Kraut AS, Omron R, Caretta‐Weyer H, Jordan J, Manthey D, Wolf SJ, et al. The flipped classroom: a critical appraisal. West J Emerg Med. 2019;20(3):527–536.
Mu S, Hu J, Liu F, Zhao C, Sun Y. New innovations and educational process in undergraduate neurology education in blended learning. Postgrad Med. 2023;135(6):551–561.
Shivaraju PT, Manu G, Vinaya M, Savkar MK. Evaluating the effectiveness of pre‐ and post‐test model of learning in a medical school. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;7(9):947–951.
Witmer BG, Jerome CJ, Singer MJ. The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence. 2005;14(3):298–312.
Vuchkova J, Maybury TS, Farah CS. Testing the educational potential of 3D visualization software in oral radiographic interpretation. J Dent Educ. 2011;75(11):1417–1425.
Khatamian Far P. Challenges of recruitment and retention of university students as research participants: lessons learned from a pilot study. J Aust Libr Inf Assoc. 2018;67(3):278–292.
Fugard AJB, Potts HWW. Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2015;18(6):669–684.
Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18(2):179–183.
Cunningham L, Murphy O. Embracing the universal design for learning framework in digital game based learning—a set of game design principles. Transforming our world through design, diversity and education. Amsterdam, NL: IOS Press; 2018. p. 409–420.
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: academic performance; computer‐aided instruction; educational methodology; game‐based learning; interactive computer graphics; neuroanatomy; serious games; teaching of neuroscience/neuroanatomy
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20250627 Latest Revision: 20250627
Update Code:
20260130
DOI:
10.1002/ase.70086
PMID:
40579384
Database:
MEDLINE
*Further Information*
*Neuroanatomy is challenging for many undergraduates, requiring strong visuospatial skills and a deep understanding of complex concepts. This study developed and evaluated SOMS BrainSpace, a digital serious game for neuroanatomy education, using a mixed methods approach. Developed in Unity, SOMS BrainSpace features three modes: (1) 3D Digital Atlas: An interactive atlas with virtual neuroanatomical models, information hotspots, and quizzes linked to a scoreboard. (2) BrainSpace Rooms: A first-person escape-room game where players interact with 3D models, characters, or diagrams to complete challenges, crack codes, and escape. (3) Blitz Clinic: A task-based mode where players complete tasks related to a neurological condition within 5 min and identify the condition to finish. Key outcomes included improvements in academic performance, motivation, and perceptions of game-based learning. The study used convenience sampling of first-year University of Sydney allied health undergraduates (n = 91) and neuroscience academics (n = 5) from the University of Sydney and the University of Adelaide. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews revealed that academics acknowledged the challenges of learning neuroanatomy for undergraduates and supported the use of game-based learning tools. Students found SOMS BrainSpace engaging and appreciated the ability to access it on personal devices. Quantitative analysis showed no significant difference in pre- (n = 79) and post-game (n = 80) knowledge quiz scores (p = 0.86). However, an inter-cohort comparison of 2023 (n = 89) and 2022 (n = 117) in-semester exam scores revealed significantly higher results for the 2023 cohort in the 'Neuroscience' topic (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that accessible game-based learning tools can enhance motivation and long-term academic performance in neuroanatomy.
(© 2025 The Author(s). Anatomical Sciences Education published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for Anatomy.)*