*Result*: Construction of the prediction model and analysis of key winning factors in world women's volleyball using gradient boosting decision tree.
Front Physiol. 2025 Feb 07;16:1429510. (PMID: 39991710)
BioData Min. 2025 Feb 17;18(1):16. (PMID: 39962522)
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Nov;67(5):753-758. (PMID: 38908723)
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Apr 10;23:1572-1583. (PMID: 38650589)
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Oct;33(10):1513-9. (PMID: 16009986)
Crit Care Med. 2024 Nov 1;52(11):1710-1721. (PMID: 38958568)
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Jun 25;19(9):874-881. (PMID: 38917990)
J Hum Kinet. 2018 Jun 13;62:221-229. (PMID: 29922393)
Sci Rep. 2025 May 11;15(1):16365. (PMID: 40348828)
Front Physiol. 2025 Jul 29;16:1605426. (PMID: 40800735)
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;22(20):. (PMID: 36298347)
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jun 1;927:172223. (PMID: 38588737)
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2021 Jul;32(7):3156-3167. (PMID: 32749969)
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15628. (PMID: 37730690)
Bioinformatics. 2024 Jun 28;40(Suppl 1):i247-i256. (PMID: 38940165)
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10):e0164568. (PMID: 27723811)
Percept Mot Skills. 2023 Dec;130(6):2603-2620. (PMID: 37879103)
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 20;857(Pt 1):159348. (PMID: 36228787)
Risk Anal. 2023 Jul;43(7):1508-1517. (PMID: 36100578)
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 May 24;23:2326-2336. (PMID: 38867722)
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2025 Aug 30;:1-15. (PMID: 40884243)
J Sports Sci. 2025 Jun 13;:1-15. (PMID: 40509963)
J Sports Sci Med. 2014 Jan 20;13(1):78-83. (PMID: 24570609)
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2025 Dec;96(4):827-855. (PMID: 40658613)
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 29;15:1447968. (PMID: 39534473)
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 17;15(1):30124. (PMID: 40820191)
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Jun 28;9(3):. (PMID: 39051275)
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Jul 03;69:103114. (PMID: 40735069)
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Oct;176:106817. (PMID: 36057162)
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Nov;124(11):3279-3290. (PMID: 38900201)
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 May 21;19(7):696-704. (PMID: 38772546)
ISA Trans. 2024 May;148:500-514. (PMID: 38641519)
Nanoscale. 2024 Mar 21;16(12):6296-6308. (PMID: 38463012)
*Further Information*
*This study aims to analyze the key factors contributing to victories in world women's volleyball matches and predict match win rates using machine learning algorithms. Initially, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) was employed to analyze the fundamental match data of the top six teams over three major world tournaments during the 2020 Olympic cycle (a total of 142 matches, 505 sets, and 27 metrics). The 27 metrics were used as subsequences, and the set win rate served as the parent sequence to identify metrics with a high contribution to match victories. Subsequently, the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) algorithm was utilized to construct a prediction model for match win rates, using the selected metrics as input features and set win rates as output features. The input metrics were ranked by their contribution to determine the most influential factors on match victories. The results indicate that spike scoring rate, blocking height, excellent defense rate, serve scoring rate, block scoring rate, proportion of serve scores, and proportion of block scores significantly impact match victories. Among these, spike scoring rate and blocking height are decisive, with feature importance values of 0.45 and 0.3, respectively. The constructed GBDT model demonstrated good predictive performance, capable of predicting match win rates. The model parameters are as follows: learning rate (learning-rate) of 0.1, number of trees (n-estimators) of 150, and maximum depth of the tree model (max-depth) of 2. The model's accuracy metrics on the test set are: MSE = 0.002, MAE = 0.0322, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8497, and MAPE = 4.77%. The average relative error of the model validation is 5.30%, with R<sup>2</sup> = 0.743. This study not only identifies the key factors contributing to victories in world women's volleyball but also demonstrates the innovative application of combining Grey Relational Analysis with the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree algorithm in the volleyball domain. The findings provide data-driven insights to support coaches in training design and in-game decision-making, highlighting important practical value.
(© 2025. The Author(s).)*
*Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.*