*Result*: Artificial intelligence in medicine: a position paper by the Italian Society of Internal Medicine.

Title:
Artificial intelligence in medicine: a position paper by the Italian Society of Internal Medicine.
Authors:
Balsano C; Geriatric Unit, School of Emergency-Urgency Medicine, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences-MESVA, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy., Cabitza F; Department of Informatics, Systems and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.; IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy., Cicco S; Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Unit of Internal Medicine 'Guido Baccelli', University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy. sebastiano.cicco@uniba.it.; Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Telemedicine Research Center, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy. sebastiano.cicco@uniba.it., Gori M; Department of Information Engineering and Mathematics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy., Malerba D; Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Telemedicine Research Center, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.; Department of Informatics, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy., Montagna M; School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. montagna.marco@hsr.it., Tarquini R; SOC Medicina Interna, USL Toscana Centro, Empoli, Italy., Vacca A; Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Unit of Internal Medicine 'Guido Baccelli', University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.; Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Telemedicine Research Center, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Source:
Internal and emergency medicine [Intern Emerg Med] 2026 Jan; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 1-14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Dec 19.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: Italy NLM ID: 101263418 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1970-9366 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 18280447 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Intern Emerg Med Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Milan : Springer
Original Publication: Rome, Italy : CEPI-AIM Group, 2006-
References:
Getting Started in Medical AI | Towards Data Science. https://towardsdatascience.com/getting-started-in-medical-ai-93737bea5575/ . Accessed 1 Jul 2025.
Kelly BS, Judge C, Bollard SM et al (2022) Radiology artificial intelligence: a systematic review and evaluation of methods (RAISE). Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08784-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s00330-022-08784-6355939619668934)
van Leeuwen KG, Schalekamp S, Rutten MJCM et al (2021) Artificial intelligence in radiology: 100 commercially available products and their scientific evidence. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07892-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s00330-021-07892-z338565198128724)
Cazzato G, Massaro A, Colagrande A et al (2022) Dermatopathology of malignant melanoma in the era of artificial intelligence: a single institutional experience. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081972. (PMID: 10.3390/diagnostics12081972365532279777378)
Grant L, Joo P, Nemnom MJ, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V (2022) Machine learning versus traditional methods for the development of risk stratification scores: a case study using original Canadian Syncope Risk Score data. Intern Emerg Med 17:1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11739-021-02873-Y. (PMID: 10.1007/S11739-021-02873-Y34734350)
Dipaola F, Gebska MA, Gatti M et al (2024) Will artificial intelligence be “Better” than humans in the management of syncope? JACC Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACADV.2024.101072. (PMID: 10.1016/J.JACADV.2024.1010723937245011450913)
Vearrier L, Derse AR, Basford JB et al (2022) Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: benefits, risks, and recommendations. J Emerg Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.01.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.01.00135164977)
Marozzi MS, Cicco S, Mancini F et al (2024) A novel automatic algorithm to support lung ultrasound non-expert physicians in interstitial pneumonia evaluation: a single-center study. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020155. (PMID: 10.3390/diagnostics140201553824803210814651)
Dipaola F, Gatti M, Giaj Levra A et al (2023) Multimodal deep learning for COVID-19 prognosis prediction in the emergency department: a bi-centric study. Sci Rep 13:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37512-3. (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-023-37512-3)
Liu N, Liu M, Chen X et al (2022) Development and validation of an interpretable prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (P-ROSC) score for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using machine learning: a retrospective study. EClinicalMedicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101422. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101422367128939874347)
Lee JT, Hsieh CC, Lin CH et al (2021) Prediction of hospitalization using artificial intelligence for urgent patients in the emergency department. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98961-2. (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-021-98961-2349699548718538)
Durairaj KK, Baker O, Bertossi D et al (2024) Artificial intelligence versus expert plastic surgeon: comparative study shows ChatGPT “Wins” rhinoplasty consultations: should we be worried? Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 26:270–275. https://doi.org/10.1089/FPSAM.2023.0224. (PMID: 10.1089/FPSAM.2023.022437982677)
Singla A, Khanna R, Kaur M et al (2024) Developing a chatbot to support individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders: tutorial. J Med Internet Res 26:e50182. https://doi.org/10.2196/50182. (PMID: 10.2196/501823888894711220430)
Lee P, Bubeck S, Petro J (2023) Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for medicine. N Engl J Med 388:1233–1239. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMSR2214184/SUPPL_FILE/NEJMSR2214184_DISCLOSURES.PDF. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMSR2214184/SUPPL_FILE/NEJMSR2214184_DISCLOSURES.PDF36988602)
Laymouna M, Ma Y, Lessard D et al (2024) Roles, users, benefits, and limitations of chatbots in health care: rapid review. J Med Internet Res 26:e56930. https://doi.org/10.2196/56930. (PMID: 10.2196/569303904244611303905)
Montagna S, Aguzzi G, Ferretti S, et al (2024) LLM-based Solutions for Healthcare Chatbots: a Comparative Analysis. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events, PerCom Workshops 2024. pp 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMWORKSHOPS59983.2024.10503257.
Johri S, Jeong J, Tran BA et al (2025) An evaluation framework for clinical use of large language models in patient interaction tasks. Nat Med 2025(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03328-5. (PMID: 10.1038/s41591-024-03328-5)
Goh E, Gallo R, Hom J et al (2024) Large language model influence on diagnostic reasoning: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 7:e2440969–e2440969. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2024.40969. (PMID: 10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2024.409693946624511519755)
Esmaeilzadeh P, Mirzaei T, Dharanikota S (2021) Patients’ perceptions toward human-artificial intelligence interaction in health care: experimental study. J Med Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.2196/25856. (PMID: 10.2196/25856348425358663518)
Nagendran M, Festor P, Komorowski M et al (2023) Quantifying the impact of AI recommendations with explanations on prescription decision making. NPJ Digit Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00955-z. (PMID: 10.1038/s41746-023-00955-z3793595310630476)
Johnson KW, Torres Soto J, Glicksberg BS et al (2018) Artificial intelligence in cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.521. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.52130466522)
Muthukrishnan N, Maleki F, Ovens K et al (2020) Brief history of artificial intelligence. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2020.07.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.nic.2020.07.00433038994)
Illia L, Colleoni E, Zyglidopoulos S (2023) Ethical implications of text generation in the age of artificial intelligence. Bus Ethics Environ Responsib. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12479. (PMID: 10.1111/beer.12479)
Jean A (2020) A brief history of artificial intelligence. Medecine/Sciences. 36:1059–1067. (PMID: 10.1051/medsci/202018933151868)
Agate J (2025) Artificial intelligence methods and approaches to improve data quality in healthcare data. Artif Intell Life Sci 8:100135. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AILSCI.2025.100135. (PMID: 10.1016/J.AILSCI.2025.100135)
Sezgin E (2023) Artificial intelligence in healthcare: complementing, not replacing, doctors and healthcare providers. Digit Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231186520. (PMID: 10.1177/205520762311865203742659310328041)
Bradley SH (2024) Forget about replacing doctors with AI-just get our computers to work. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.Q1171. (PMID: 10.1136/BMJ.Q11713901956010792684)
Aung YYM, Wong DCS, Ting DSW (2021) The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Br Med Bull. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab016. (PMID: 10.1093/bmb/ldab01634405854)
Korot E, Wagner SK, Faes L et al (2020) Will AI replace ophthalmologists? Transl Vis Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.2. (PMID: 10.1167/tvst.9.2.2327044127343674)
Goulenok C, Kentish-Barnes N, Bougouin W (2025) Stop asking if AI will replace ICU doctors! Start asking how it will radically transform their practice. Intensive Care Med 51:1351–1353. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00134-025-07923-Z/FIGURES/1. (PMID: 10.1007/S00134-025-07923-Z/FIGURES/140323460)
Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A et al (2023) Performance of chatgpt on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS Digit Health 2:e0000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PDIG.0000198. (PMID: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PDIG.0000198368126459931230)
Singhal K, Azizi S, Tu T et al (2023) Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2. (PMID: 10.1038/s41586-023-06291-23750097910412443)
Huo B, Boyle A, Marfo N et al (2025) Large language models for chatbot health advice studies: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open 8:e2457879–e2457879. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2024.57879. (PMID: 10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2024.578793990346311795331)
Nhat PTH, Van Hao N, Tho PV et al (2023) Clinical benefit of AI-assisted lung ultrasound in a resource-limited intensive care unit. Crit Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04548-w. (PMID: 10.1186/s13054-023-04548-w3739333010314555)
Lee J, Kim WH, Kim J et al (2025) Efficacy of a real-time artificial intelligence ultrasound system with computer-aided detection and diagnosis for breast cancer: a feasibility study. J Breast Cancer 28:206. https://doi.org/10.4048/JBC.2024.0303. (PMID: 10.4048/JBC.2024.03034061818812230290)
Giacobbe DR, Vena A, Bassetti M (2025) Role of artificial intelligence in ICU therapeutic decision-making for severe infections. Curr Opin Crit Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001304. (PMID: 10.1097/MCC.00000000000013044062183712573687)
Della Ripa S, Santos N, Walker D (2025) AI-enabled obstetric point-of-care ultrasound as an emerging technology in low- and middle-income countries: provider and health system perspectives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 25:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12884-025-07796-6/FIGURES/6. (PMID: 10.1186/S12884-025-07796-6/FIGURES/6)
East SA, Wang Y, Yanamala N et al (2025) Artificial intelligence-enabled point-of-care echocardiography: bringing precision imaging to the bedside. Curr Atheroscler Rep 27:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11883-025-01316-9/FIGURES/6. (PMID: 10.1007/S11883-025-01316-9/FIGURES/6)
Falavigna G, Costantino G, Furlan R et al (2019) Artificial neural networks and risk stratification in emergency departments. Intern Emerg Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-018-1971-2. (PMID: 10.1007/s11739-018-1971-230353271)
Costantino G, Falavigna G, Solbiati M et al (2017) Neural networks as a tool to predict syncope risk in the emergency department. Europace. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw336. (PMID: 10.1093/europace/euw33628017935)
Haim GB, Braun A, Eden H et al (2024) AI in the ED: assessing the efficacy of GPT models vs. physicians in medical score calculation. Am J Emerg Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.02.016. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.02.01639106739)
Levra AG, Gatti M, Mene R et al (2025) A large language model-based clinical decision support system for syncope recognition in the emergency department: a framework for clinical workflow integration. Eur J Intern Med 131:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2024.09.017. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ejim.2024.09.01739341748)
Levra AG, Gatti M, Mene R et al (2025) Validation of syncope short-term outcomes prediction by machine learning models in an Italian emergency department cohort. Intern Emerg Med 20:1597–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11739-025-04034-X/FIGURES/3. (PMID: 10.1007/S11739-025-04034-X/FIGURES/34066851612331830)
Dipaola F, Gatti M, Pacetti V et al (2019) Artificial intelligence algorithms and natural language processing for the recognition of syncope patients on emergency department medical records. J Clin Med. 8:1677. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM8101677. (PMID: 10.3390/JCM8101677316149826832155)
Dicorato MM, Basile P, Naccarati ML et al (2025) Predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a review. J Clin Med 14:2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM14062018. (PMID: 10.3390/JCM140620184014282511942920)
Dipaola F, Gatti M, Menè R et al (2024) A hybrid model for 30-day syncope prognosis prediction in the emergency department. J Pers Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14010004. (PMID: 10.3390/jpm14010004)
Jacobs SM, Lundy NN, Issenberg SB, Chandran L (2023) Reimagining core entrustable professional activities for undergraduate medical education in the era of artificial intelligence. JMIR Med Educ 9:e50903. https://doi.org/10.2196/50903. (PMID: 10.2196/509033805272110762622)
Lee J, Wu AS, Li D, Kulasegaram K (2021) Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. Acad Med 96:S62–S70. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.000000000000429134348374)
Tsopra R, Peiffer-Smadja N, Charlier C et al (2023) Putting undergraduate medical students in AI-CDSS designers’ shoes: an innovative teaching method to develop digital health critical thinking. Int J Med Inform. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104980. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.10498036681042)
World Health Organization (2021) Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. OMS 1:.
Montagna M, Chiabrando F, De Lorenzo R, Querini PR (2025) Impact of clinical decision support systems on medical students’ case-solving performance: comparison study with a focus group. JMIR Med Educ. 11:e55709. https://doi.org/10.2196/55709. (PMID: 10.2196/557094010118311936302)
Eysenbach G (2023) The role of ChatGPT, generative language models, and artificial intelligence in medical education: a conversation with ChatGPT and a call for papers. JMIR Med Educ. https://doi.org/10.2196/46885. (PMID: 10.2196/468853686393710028514)
Furlan R, Gatti M, Mene R et al (2022) Learning analytics applied to clinical diagnostic reasoning using a natural language processing-based virtual patient simulator: case study. JMIR Med Educ. https://doi.org/10.2196/24372. (PMID: 10.2196/24372352387868931645)
Furlan R, Gatti M, Menè R et al (2021) A natural language processing-based virtual patient simulator and intelligent tutoring system for the clinical diagnostic process: Simulator development and case study. JMIR Med Inform. https://doi.org/10.2196/24073. (PMID: 10.2196/24073337208408041050)
Doll J, Anzalone AJ, Clarke M et al (2024) A call for a health data-informed workforce among clinicians. JMIR Med Educ 10:e52290. https://doi.org/10.2196/52290. (PMID: 10.2196/522903888909111194696)
Goodman KE, Rodman AM, Morgan DJ (2023) Preparing physicians for the clinical algorithm era. N Engl J Med 389:483–487. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2304839. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMp230483937548320)
Civan Kahve A, Çapar DG, Keleş MK et al (2025) Psychological effects of being a healthcare worker and a caregiver for cancer patients: a comparative analysis. Support Care Cancer 33:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00520-025-09699-W/TABLES/5. (PMID: 10.1007/S00520-025-09699-W/TABLES/5)
Thronsao C, Thongkum W, Yoosook W et al (2025) Occupational stress and burnout with work-related musculoskeletal disorders in emergency medical personnel. Stud Health Technol Inform 328:520–524. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI250774. (PMID: 10.3233/SHTI25077440588980)
Scheepers R, Silkens M, van den Berg J, Lombarts K (2020) Associations between job demands, job resources and patient-related burnout among physicians: results from a multicentre observational study. BMJ Open 10:e038466. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-038466. (PMID: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-038466329730637517563)
Rajkomar A, Dean J, Kohane I (2019) Machine learning in medicine. N Engl J Med 380:1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMRA1814259. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMRA181425930943338)
Bienefeld N, Keller E, Grote G (2025) AI interventions to alleviate healthcare shortages and enhance work conditions in critical care: qualitative analysis. J Med Internet Res. https://doi.org/10.2196/50852. (PMID: 10.2196/508523980511011773285)
Hashimoto DA, Witkowski E, Gao L et al (2020) Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: current techniques, clinical applications, and limitations. Anesthesiology 132:379–394. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002960. (PMID: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002960319398567643051)
Perkins SW, Muste JC, Alam T, Singh RP (2024) Improving clinical documentation with artificial intelligence: a systematic review. Perspect Health Inf Manag 21:1d. (PMID: 4013489911605373)
Goh E, Gallo RJ, Strong E et al (2025) GPT-4 assistance for improvement of physician performance on patient care tasks: a randomized controlled trial. Nat Med 31(4):1233–1238. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03456-y. (PMID: 10.1038/s41591-024-03456-y3991027212380382)
Davenport T, Kalakota R (2019) The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J 6:94–98. https://doi.org/10.7861/FUTUREHOSP.6-2-94. (PMID: 10.7861/FUTUREHOSP.6-2-94313635136616181)
Chen Y, Esmaeilzadeh P (2024) Generative AI in medical practice: in-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges. J Med Internet Res 26:e53008. https://doi.org/10.2196/53008. (PMID: 10.2196/530083845720810960211)
Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S (2019) Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342. (PMID: 10.1126/science.aax2342316491946557272)
Chen IY, Joshi S, Ghassemi M (2020) Treating health disparities with artificial intelligence. Nat Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0649-2. (PMID: 10.1038/s41591-019-0649-2331066659990469)
Vokinger KN, Feuerriegel S, Kesselheim AS (2021) Mitigating bias in machine learning for medicine. Commun Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-021-00028-w. (PMID: 10.1038/s43856-021-00028-w345229167611652)
Topol EJ (2019) High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 25(1):44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7. (PMID: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-730617339)
Leslie D (2019) Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety systems in the public sector. The Alan Turing Institute.
Khan MR, Khan R (2024) Role of AI in enhancing accessibility for people with disabilities. J Artif Intell Gen Sci (JAIGS). 3:125–142. ISSN:3006-4023. https://doi.org/10.60087/JAIGS.VOL03.ISSUE01.P142.
Office of the European Union L- P, Luxembourg L REGULATION (EU) 2025/327 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 February 2025 on the European Health Data Space and amending Directive 2011/24/EU and Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (Text with EEA relevance) setting out criteria for establishing and evaluating European Reference Networks and their Members and for facilitating the exchange of information and expertise on establishing and evaluating such.
I (Legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance).
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (1979) Principles of biomedical ethics. 314.
Office of the European Union L- P, Luxembourg L DIRECTIVE (EU) 2024/2853 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 October 2024 on liability for defective products and repealing Council Directive 85/374/EEC (Text with EEA relevance).
Office of the European Union L- P, Luxembourg L Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act)Text with EEA relevance.
Samuel G, Lucassen AM (2022) The environmental sustainability of data-driven health research: a scoping review. Digit Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221111297. (PMID: 10.1177/20552076221111297358475269277423)
Röösli E, Rice B, Hernandez-Boussard T (2021) Bias at warp speed: how AI may contribute to the disparities gap in the time of COVID-19. J Am Med Inform Assoc 28:190–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/JAMIA/OCAA210. (PMID: 10.1093/JAMIA/OCAA210328050047454645)
Richie C (2022) Environmentally sustainable development and use of artificial intelligence in health care. Bioethics 36:547–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/BIOE.13018. (PMID: 10.1111/BIOE.13018352906759311654)
Environmental Sustainability and Healthcare: Worldwide Markets | Alira Health. https://alirahealth.com/education-hub/environmental-sustainability-and-healthcare-examples-from-worldwide-markets/ . Accessed 20 Jun 2025.
Patz JA, Frumkin H, Holloway T et al (2014) Climate change: challenges and opportunities for global health. JAMA 312:1565–1580. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2014.13186. (PMID: 10.1001/JAMA.2014.13186252443626108836)
Rabin AS, Pinsky EG (2023) Reducing health care’s climate impact—mission critical or extra credit? N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2305709. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMp230570938048201)
de Vries A (2023) The growing energy footprint of artificial intelligence. Joule 7:2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.09.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joule.2023.09.004)
Luccioni AS, Jernite Y (2024) Power Hungry Processing: ⚡ Watts ⚡ Driving the Cost of AI Deployment? ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT ’24), June 3â•fi6, 2024, Rio de Janeiro. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658542.
Patterson D, Gonzalez J, Le Q, et al (2021) Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Training.
Islam MS, Zisad SN, Kor AL, Hasan MH (2023) Sustainability of Machine Learning Models: An Energy Consumption Centric Evaluation. 3rd International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering, ECCE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE57851.2023.10101532.
Malerba D, Pasquadibisceglie V (2024) Data-centric AI. J Intell Inf Syst 62:1493–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10844-024-00901-9. (PMID: 10.1007/S10844-024-00901-9)
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Advocacy; Checklists; Explainable AI; Key opinion leaders; Machine learning; Recommendations
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20251219 Date Completed: 20260307 Latest Revision: 20260307
Update Code:
20260308
PubMed Central ID:
PMC12948900
DOI:
10.1007/s11739-025-04146-4
PMID:
41417443
Database:
MEDLINE

*Further Information*

*Artificial Intelligence (AI) represents an innovative technological support for clinical practice. The Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI) emphasizes the need for clear guidance on the use of AI in medicine, recognizing that knowledge in this field is continuously evolving. This position paper presents a comprehensive vision for the responsible integration of AI into clinical practice. AI should serve as a support tool-not a replacement-for clinicians. It has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce administrative workload, and strengthen the physician-patient relationship. In the light of these characteristics, SIMI advocates for transparency, data privacy, equity, and sustainability in the development and implementation of AI systems. SIMI also highlights several ethical, legal, and methodological challenges that must be addressed, including algorithmic bias, environmental impact, and disparities in access. Ultimately, SIMI envisions a future in which AI augments human expertise, enabling more efficient, personalized, and compassionate care. SIMI calls for active clinician participation in the co-design and validation of AI tools to ensure alignment with real-world clinical needs. Key recommendations include the preferential use of certified AI systems, the integration of AI education into medical training, and continuous monitoring after deployment.
(© 2025. The Author(s).)*

*Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Human and animal rights statement and Informed consent: This article does not contain any study regarding human or animal subjects.*