Treffer: Peripheral crowding is invariant under different luminance levels.

Title:
Peripheral crowding is invariant under different luminance levels.
Authors:
Tanriverdi D; Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: d.tanriverdi@umcg.nl., Jansonius NM; Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands., Cornelissen FW; Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Source:
Vision research [Vision Res] 2026 Mar; Vol. 240, pp. 108750. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Dec 23.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Elsevier Science Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0417402 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1878-5646 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00426989 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Vision Res Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Kidlington, Oxford : Elsevier Science Ltd.
Original Publication: Oxford [etc.]
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Crowding; Luminance; Mesopic; Peripheral vision; Photopic; Scotopic
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20251224 Date Completed: 20260201 Latest Revision: 20260201
Update Code:
20260202
DOI:
10.1016/j.visres.2025.108750
PMID:
41442797
Database:
MEDLINE

Weitere Informationen

Peripheral crowding is the difficulty in recognizing objects in cluttered peripheral vision, affecting tasks like reading, visual search, and driving. The luminance of the environment also plays a significant role in these tasks. However, the potential interaction between crowding and luminance is still not clear. This study examined peripheral crowding (10 deg) by measuring its magnitude and critical spacing across a wide range of luminance levels, spanning from scotopic to photopic conditions. Ten participants binocularly identified the orientation of a target presented alone or flanked by four flankers. Responses were made by adjusting a central reference stimulus. Luminance was manipulated using neutral-density filter goggles (0.02-200 cd/m<sup>2</sup>). The distribution of differences between reported and actual target orientations was obtained, and the standard deviation of these distributions was taken as the perceptual error for each condition. Crowding magnitude was calculated by dividing perceptual error in the flanked condition by that in the isolated condition. Critical spacing was defined as the maximum separation between target and flanker for crowding to occur. It was calculated by fitting a hinged-line to the perceptual errors as a function of target-flanker-distance. Crowding magnitude and critical spacing were both measured for flankers with either no gap, a gap with a size matching each individual's luminance-specific acuity threshold, or a suprathreshold (200 % of worst-acuity) gap. Results showed that both crowding magnitude and critical spacing were similar under all luminance and gap conditions. Our findings suggest that the same peripheral crowding mechanisms operate under scotopic and photopic conditions.
(Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)