*Result*: XGBoost based machine learning prediction model for major adverse cardiovascular events after PCI in STEMI patients.
Med Phys. 2023 Jan;50(1):30-37. (PMID: 36342301)
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. (PMID: 28886621)
Angiology. 2025 Oct;76(9):876-885. (PMID: 38763893)
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Mar;125(6):1041-6. (PMID: 22613528)
JAMA. 1998 Oct 28;280(16):1405-9. (PMID: 9800999)
Eur Heart J. 2008 Apr;29(7):932-40. (PMID: 18334475)
JAMA. 2021 Feb 9;325(6):552-560. (PMID: 33560322)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Dec 5;82(23):2167-2176. (PMID: 37995152)
J Stat Softw. 2011 Mar;39(5):1-13. (PMID: 27065756)
Circulation. 2000 Oct 24;102(17):2031-7. (PMID: 11044416)
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 3;13(1):4512. (PMID: 35922410)
N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 25;390(16):1481-1492. (PMID: 38587995)
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Nov;90:294-302. (PMID: 32916271)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Nov 18-25;64(20):2101-8. (PMID: 25457398)
Chemosphere. 2023 Oct;337:139435. (PMID: 37422210)
Brain Behav Immun. 2024 Mar;117:149-154. (PMID: 38218349)
J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Oct;29(4):301-315. (PMID: 34719895)
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Oct;42(10):942-951. (PMID: 31415103)
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Feb 15;24(1):76. (PMID: 39955553)
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 1;832:155070. (PMID: 35398119)
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Feb 18;24(1):80. (PMID: 39966813)
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Apr 20;10(4):e33395. (PMID: 35442202)
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Jun 6;5(1):39. (PMID: 31171787)
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 May 11;31(7):845-855. (PMID: 37995305)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 14;75(14):1631-1640. (PMID: 32273029)
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018 May 7;14:91-118. (PMID: 29401044)
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):487-493. (PMID: 31857443)
Atherosclerosis. 2018 Jul;274:212-217. (PMID: 29803159)
EuroIntervention. 2023 Sep 18;19(7):571-579. (PMID: 37482940)
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3911-3925. (PMID: 37381774)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Jan 7;85(1):19-38. (PMID: 39779054)
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jul 1;932:173085. (PMID: 38729377)
*Further Information*
*ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) demands urgent reperfusion. Despite major strides in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) persist, calling for more comprehensive risk evaluation and management. Clinical data from 1,011 STEMI patients who underwent PCI were included in this study. A total of 37 clinical variables-including demographic characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and laboratory indicators-were initially collected. Six machine learning algorithms, including random forest (RF), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso), support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and feedforward neural network (FNN), were employed to select key predictors and construct a MACE prediction model. Partial dependence plots (PDP) and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were subsequently used to interpret model variables and visualize the decision-making process. The XGBoost model, based on nine key predictors, demonstrated the best performance (AUC: 0.81 for the training set, 0.71 for the test set). SHAP analysis identified LCX occlusion, KILLIP classification, lymphocyte count, LVEF, AST, monocyte count, gender, alcohol consumption, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were positively associated with the risk of MACE, whereas higher lymphocyte levels and male sex were negatively associated with the occurrence of MACE. PDP results revealed the synergistic effects of AST, LCX, monocyte count, LVEF, and lymphocyte count on MACE risk. This study provides a clinically promising predictive model for MACE risk assessment in STEMI patients post-PCI. The model, using interpretable methods, identifies key clinical indicators that critically influence MACE occurrence, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making and patient management.
(© 2026. The Author(s).)*
*Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the local research ethics committee (Ansteel Group Hospital, Anshan, Liaoning, China; No.2023–32). Because of the retrospective design of the study, the need to obtain informed consent from eligible patients was waived by the ethics committee.*