*Result*: Early prediction of pressure injury risk in hospitalized patients using supervised machine learning models based on nursing records.
Li, Z., Lin, F., Thalib, L. & Chaboyer, W. Global prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries in hospitalised adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud.105, 103546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103546 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.10354632113142)
Alderden, J., Rondinelli, J., Pepper, G., Cummins, M. & Whitney, J. Risk factors for pressure injuries among critical care patients: A systematic review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud.71, 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.012 (2017). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.012283845335485873)
Shahin, E. S., Dassen, T. & Halfens, R. J. Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in intensive care patients: a literature review. Nurs. Crit. Care13, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00249.x (2008). (PMID: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00249.x18289185)
Padula, W. V. & Delarmente, B. A. The national cost of hospital?acquired pressure injuries in the united states. Int. Wound J.16, 634–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13071 (2019). (PMID: 10.1111/iwj.13071306936447948545)
Liu, S., Rawson, H., Islam, R. M. & Team, V. Impact of pressure injuries on health?related quality of life: A systematic review. Wound Repair and Regeneration 33, https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13236 (2024).
Padilla, P. L., Hancock, E. L., Ruff, E. S., Zapata-Sirvent, R. L. & Phillips, L. G. Pressure Injuries, 367–376 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).
Cai, J., Zha, M., Yuan, B., Xie, Q. & Chen, H. Prevalence of pressure injury among chinese community?dwelling older people and its risk factors: A national survey based on chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey. J. Adv. Nurs.75, 2516–2525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14008 (2019). (PMID: 10.1111/jan.1400830950527)
Weng, P., Lin, Y., Seo, J. & Chang, W. Relationship between predisposing and facilitating factors: Does it influence the risk of developing peri?operative pressure injuries?. Int. Wound J.19, 2082–2091. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13811 (2022). (PMID: 10.1111/iwj.13811353734489705162)
Alderden, J. et al. Midrange braden subscale scores are associated with increased risk for pressure injury development among critical care patients. J. Wound, Ostomy Contin. Nurs.44, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1097/won.0000000000000349 (2017).
Beeckman, D., Van Lancker, A., Van Hecke, A. & Verhaeghe, S. A systematic review and meta? Analysis of incontinence? Associated dermatitis, incontinence, and moisture as risk factors for pressure ulcer development. Res. Nurs. Health37, 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21593 (2014).
Lachenbruch, C., Ribble, D., Emmons, K. & VanGilder, C. Pressure ulcer risk in the incontinent patient: Analysis of incontinence and hospital-acquired pressure ulcers from the international pressure ulcer prevalence™ survey. J. Wound Ostomy Contin. Nurs.43, 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/won.0000000000000225 (2016).
Kebapci, A. & Tilki, R. The effect of vasopressor agents on pressure injury development in intensive care patients. Intensive Crit. Care Nurs.83, 103630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103630 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.10363038479195)
Gillespie, B. M. et al. Repositioning for pressure injury prevention in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009958.pub3 (2020).
Shi, C. et al. Beds, overlays and mattresses for preventing and treating pressure ulcers: an overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013761.pub2 (2021).
Stellar, J. J. et al. Medical device-related pressure injuries in infants and children. J. Wound Ostomy Contin. Nurs.47, 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1097/won.0000000000000683 (2020).
Coyer, F., Cook, J.-L., Doubrovsky, A., Vann, A. & McNamara, G. Exploring medical device-related pressure injuries in a single intensive care setting: A longitudinal point prevalence study. Intensive Crit. Care Nurs.68, 103155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103155 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.10315534736833)
Celik, S., Taskin Yilmaz, F. & Altas, G. Medical <scp>device?related</scp> pressure injuries in adult intensive care units. J. Clin. Nurs.32, 3863–3873. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16516 (2022).
Jia, Y.-J. et al. Body mass index and pressure injuries risk in hospitalized adult patients: A dose-response analysis. J. Tissue Viability33, 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.06.006 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jtv.2024.06.00638886143)
Ness, S. J., Hickling, D. F., Bell, J. J. & Collins, P. F. The pressures of obesity: The relationship between obesity, malnutrition and pressure injuries in hospital inpatients. Clin. Nutr.37, 1569–1574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.08.014 (2018). (PMID: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.08.01428890276)
Padula, W. V., Armstrong, D. G., Pronovost, P. J. & Saria, S. Predicting pressure injury risk in hospitalised patients using machine learning with electronic health records: a us multilevel cohort study. BMJ Open14, e082540. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082540 (2024). (PMID: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-0825403859407811146395)
Zhou, Y., Yang, X., Ma, S., Yuan, Y. & Yan, M. A systematic review of predictive models for hospital?acquired pressure injury using machine learning. Nurs. Open10, 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1429 (2022). (PMID: 10.1002/nop2.1429363104179912391)
Toffaha, K. M., Simsekler, M. C. E. & Omar, M. A. Leveraging artificial intelligence and decision support systems in hospital-acquired pressure injuries prediction: A comprehensive review. Artif. Intell. Med.141, 102560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102560 (2023). (PMID: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.10256037295900)
Qu, C. et al. The predictive effect of different machine learning algorithms for pressure injuries in hospitalized patients: A network meta-analyses. Heliyon8, e11361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11361 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11361363874409649958)
Pei, J. et al. Machine learning?based prediction models for pressure injury: A systematic review and meta?analysis. Int. Wound J.20, 4328–4339. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14280 (2023). (PMID: 10.1111/iwj.142803734052010681397)
Alves, J., Azevedo, R., Marques, A., Encarnação, R. & Alves, P. Pressure injury prediction in intensive care units using artificial intelligence: A scoping review. Nursing Reports15, 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15040126 (2025). (PMID: 10.3390/nursrep150401264033826412030323)
Huang, Y., Li, J., Li, M. & Aparasu, R. R. Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review. BMC Med. Res. Methodol.23, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02078-1 (2023).
Nakagami, G. et al. Supervised machine learning-based prediction for in-hospital pressure injury development using electronic health records: A retrospective observational cohort study in a university hospital in japan. Int. J. Nurs. Stud.119, 103932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103932 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.10393233975074)
Nguyen, K.-A.-N. et al. Electronic-medical-record-driven machine learning predictive model for hospital-acquired pressure injuries: Development and external validation. J. Clin. Med.14, 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041175 (2025). (PMID: 10.3390/jcm140411754000470611857033)
Charon, C., Wuillemin, P.-H., Havreng-Théry, C. & Belmin, J. One month prediction of pressure ulcers in nursing home residents with bayesian networks. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc.25, 104945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.01.014 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.01.01438431264)
Walther, F., Heinrich, L., Schmitt, J., Eberlein-Gonska, M. & Roessler, M. Prediction of inpatient pressure ulcers based on routine healthcare data using machine learning methodology. Sci. Rep.12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09050-x (2022).
Facchinello, Y., Beauséjour, M., Richard-Denis, A., Thompson, C. & Mac-Thiong, J.-M. Use of regression tree analysis for predicting the functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma38, 1285–1291. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5321 (2021). (PMID: 10.1089/neu.2017.532129065782)
Goodwin, T. R. & Demner-Fushman, D. A customizable deep learning model for nosocomial risk prediction from critical care notes with indirect supervision. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.27, 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa004 (2020). (PMID: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa004320656287075529)
Shinkawa, M. et al. A novel skin temperature estimation system for predicting pressure injury occurrence based on continuous body sensor data: A pilot study. Clin. Biomech.122, 106413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106413 (2025). (PMID: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106413)
Ho, J. C., Sotoodeh, M., Zhang, W., Simpson, R. L. & Hertzberg, V. S. An adaboost-based algorithm to detect hospital-acquired pressure injury in the presence of conflicting annotations. Comput. Biol. Med.168, 107754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107754 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.10775438016372)
Wei, L. et al. A machine learning algorithm-based predictive model for pressure injury risk in emergency patients: A prospective cohort study. Int. Emerg. Nurs.74, 101419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101419 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.10141938432045)
Xu, J. et al. Development and validation of a machine learning algorithm–based risk prediction model of pressure injury in the intensive care unit. Int. Wound J.19, 1637–1649. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13764 (2022). (PMID: 10.1111/iwj.13764350770009615270)
Dweekat, O. Y., Lam, S. S. & McGrath, L. An integrated system of multifaceted machine learning models to predict if and when hospital-acquired pressure injuries (bedsores) occur. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health20, 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010828 (2023). (PMID: 10.3390/ijerph20010828366131509820011)
Xu, J., Chen, T., Fang, X., Xia, L. & Pan, X. Prediction model of pressure injury occurrence in diabetic patients during icu hospitalization——xgboost machine learning model can be interpreted based on shap. Intensive Crit. Care Nurs.83, 103715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103715 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.10371538701634)
Chun, X. et al. A model for predicting 7?day pressure injury outcomes in paediatric patients: A machine learning approach. J. Adv. Nurs.77, 1304–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14680 (2020). (PMID: 10.1111/jan.1468033617026)
Campagnini, S. et al. Cross-validation of predictive models for functional recovery after post-stroke rehabilitation. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil.19, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01075-7 (2022).
Chen, Y.-H. et al. Post-surgical fall risk prediction: a machine learning approach for spine and lower extremity procedures. Front. Med.12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1574305 (2025).
VanGilder, C. A., Cox, J., Edsberg, L. E. & Koloms, K. Pressure injury prevalence in acute care hospitals with unit-specific analysis: Results from the international pressure ulcer prevalence (ipup) survey database. Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing48, 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1097/won.0000000000000817 (2021). (PMID: 10.1097/won.0000000000000817)
Levner, I. Feature selection and nearest centroid classification for protein mass spectrometry. BMC Bioinform.6, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-68 (2005).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res.12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Zantvoort, K. et al. Estimation of minimal data sets sizes for machine learning predictions in digital mental health interventions. NPJ Digit. Med.7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01360-w (2024).
Wan, S. & Yang, H. Comparison among methods of ensemble learning. In 2013 International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies, 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1109/isbast.2013.50 (IEEE, 2013).
Dhilsath, F. M. & Samuel, S. J. Hyperparameter tuning of ensemble classifiers using grid search and random search for prediction of heart disease. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119818717.ch8 (2021).
He, J. & Cheng, M. X. Weighting methods for rare event identification from imbalanced datasets. Front. Big Data4, https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2021.715320 (2021).
Abdelhamid, M. & Desai, A. Balancing the scales: A comprehensive study on tackling class imbalance in binary classification. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2409.19751 (2024).
Yuan, X., Liu, S., Feng, W. & Dauphin, G. Feature importance ranking of random forest-based end-to-end learning algorithm. Remote Sensing15, 5203. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15215203 (2023). (PMID: 10.3390/rs15215203)
Chicco, D., Sichenze, A. & Jurman, G. A simple guide to the use of student’s t-test, Mann–Whitney u test, chi-squared test, and Kruskal–Wallis test in biostatistics. BioData Min.18, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-025-00465-6 (2025).
Dunn, O. J. Multiple comparisons among means. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.56, 52–64 (1961). (PMID: 10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090)
Goel, P. et al. Machine learning based water requirement prediction for agriculture before a rainfall. In 2024 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/esci59607.2024.10497332 (IEEE, 2024).
Singh, D. & Singh, B. Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance. Appl. Soft Comput.97, 105524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524)
Cseh, B., Balogh, Z., Takács, J., Túri, G. & Dózsa, C. L. Organizational development and management factors involved in the prevention and effective therapy of pressure ulcers: The results of the national survey conducted among hungarian public hospitals. Int. Wound J.21, https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14655 (2024).
Jung, Y. K., Hahn, H. M. & Park, D. H. Factors influencing the severity of medical device?related pressure injuries: Pressure injury staging comparison. Int. Wound J.20, 2735–2741. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14147 (2023). (PMID: 10.1111/iwj.141473693876210410316)
Sasabe, Y. et al. Deep sedation predicts pressure injury in patients admitted to intensive care units. Nurs. Crit. Care27, 877–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12753 (2022). (PMID: 10.1111/nicc.1275335048476)
Barakat-Johnson, M., Barnett, C., Lai, M., Wand, T. & White, K. Incontinence, incontinence-associated dermatitis, and pressure injuries in a health district in australia: A mixed-methods study. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs.45, 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1097/won.0000000000000446 (2018).
Hong, J. E., Shim, M.-O., Choi, H., Been, Y. & Park, S. Factors aggravating the stage of pressure injury in dyspneic patients. J. Tissue Viability34, 100898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100898 (2025). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jtv.2025.10089840233473)
Ness, M. J., Davis, D. M. R. & Carey, W. A. Neonatal skin care: a concise review. Int. J. Dermatol.52, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05687.x (2012). (PMID: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05687.x)
Takashima, M., Hyun, A., Gibson, V., Borello, E. & Ullman, A. Invasive device?associated skin complications and mechanical dysfunctions in paediatric healthcare: A systematic review and meta?analysis. J. Adv. Nurs.80, 4034–4049. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16073 (2024). (PMID: 10.1111/jan.1607338263365)
Li, Y., Scheel-Sailer, A., Riener, R. & Paez-Granados, D. Mixed-variable graphical modeling framework towards risk prediction of hospital-acquired pressure injury in spinal cord injury individuals. Sci. Rep.14, 25067 (2024). (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-024-75691-93944356711499609)
Zheng, L., Xue, Y.-J., Yuan, Z.-N. & Xing, X.-Z. Explainable shap-xgboost models for pressure injuries among patients requiring with mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit. Sci. Rep.15, 9878 (2025). (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-025-92848-24011888011928553)
Anderson, C., Bekele, Z., Qiu, Y., Tschannen, D. & Dinov, I. D. Modeling and prediction of pressure injury in hospitalized patients using artificial intelligence. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak.21, 253 (2021). (PMID: 10.1186/s12911-021-01608-5344618768406893)
Shafaf, N. & Malek, H. Applications of machine learning approaches in emergency medicine; a review article. Archives of academic emergency medicine7, 34 (2019). (PMID: 315557646732202)
Voutsas, F., Violos, J. & Leivadeas, A. Mitigating alert fatigue in cloud monitoring systems: A machine learning perspective. Comput. Netw.250, 110543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110543 (2024). (PMID: 10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110543)
Sahiner, B., Chen, W., Samala, R. K. & Petrick, N. Data drift in medical machine learning: implications and potential remedies. Br. J. Radiol.96, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220878 (2023).
*Further Information*
*This study aimed to employ supervised models for predicting pressure injuries in hospitalized patients using data collected within the first eight hours after admission, thus providing a tool for early assessment and prevention. The dataset included 446 patients admitted to multiple hospital wards at Félix Bulnes Clinical Service Hospital in Santiago, Chile, between January and December 2022. After preprocessing the data through imputation and feature selection, we evaluated five machine learning models, Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Support Vector Machines, using cross-validation. Their performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC. The incidence of pressure injuries was 18.8%, with 9.86% occurring in the adult medical-surgical unit. Key risk factors identified included size, weight, total risk score, hospital ward, dependency risk, use of anti-decubitus mattresses, physical restraints, incontinence, and pre-hospital pressure injuries (p-value < 0.01). The Random Forest model showed the best performance, achieving an AUC of 82.4%, an accuracy of 82.5%, a specificity of 86.9%, and an adjusted precision of 93.3%. These results indicate that predictive models based on early nursing records can support clinical decision-making and enable timely prevention of pressure injuries in hospitalized patients.
(© 2026. The Author(s).)*
*Declarations. Ethical considerations: This study was conducted using retrospective, anonymized secondary data originally collected as part of routine clinical care. No personally identifiable information was accessed, and all records were de-identified prior to analysis. The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee under Resolution 000-33-1321. In accordance with institutional and national ethical guidelines, the requirement for individual informed consent was waived, as the study involved only secondary, non-identifiable data and did not involve any direct interaction with patients. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.*