Treffer: Enhancing Anesthetic Depth Assessment via Unsupervised Machine Learning in Processed Electroencephalography Analysis: Novel Methodological Study.
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Dec;67(12):1858-1878. (PMID: 33190217)
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Feb 27;9(2):14. (PMID: 32704420)
Comput Biol Med. 2007 Aug;37(8):1160-6. (PMID: 17145054)
Anesth Analg. 2023 Sep 1;137(3):656-664. (PMID: 36961823)
Anesth Analg. 2020 May;130(5):1278-1291. (PMID: 31764163)
Anesthesiology. 2001 Mar;94(3):390-9; discussion 5A. (PMID: 11374596)
Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;123(4):937-60. (PMID: 26275092)
Anesthesiology. 2000 Mar;92(3):715-26. (PMID: 10719951)
Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Jan;29(1):133-150. (PMID: 37861853)
Neuroimage. 2023 Dec 1;283:120426. (PMID: 37898378)
Anesth Analg. 2023 Oct 1;137(4):887-895. (PMID: 36727845)
Int J Biomed Comput. 1991 May-Jun;28(1-2):71-89. (PMID: 1889908)
Br J Anaesth. 2004 Mar;92(3):393-9. (PMID: 14742326)
Front Comput Neurosci. 2019 May 24;13:31. (PMID: 31178711)
Physiol Meas. 2017 Feb;38(2):116-138. (PMID: 28033111)
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2638-50. (PMID: 21190458)
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2010 Jun;55(3):147-53. (PMID: 20156029)
Anesth Analg. 2024 Jun 1;138(6):1285-1294. (PMID: 37756246)
Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):539-50. (PMID: 19608830)
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Jul;87(7):774-785. (PMID: 33938673)
Anesth Analg. 2018 Nov;127(5):1104-1106. (PMID: 30335656)
Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):446-455. (PMID: 27482773)
Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:38-47. (PMID: 28044337)
J Neural Eng. 2021 Nov 17;18(6):. (PMID: 34695812)
Anesth Analg. 2009 Feb;108(2):527-35. (PMID: 19151283)
Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):975-984. (PMID: 33640118)
Anaesthesia. 2013 May;68(5):502-11. (PMID: 23521699)
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jul;115 Suppl 1:i27-i31. (PMID: 26174297)
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014 Jul;56(1):28-33. (PMID: 25289122)
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan 1;34(1):79-83. (PMID: 33060553)
Perioper Med (Lond). 2020 Jan 09;9:1. (PMID: 31921411)
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Oct;128(10):2014-2021. (PMID: 28837907)
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 28;16:1638282. (PMID: 40948652)
J Neurochem. 2025 Apr;169(4):e70070. (PMID: 40265596)
Anesth Analg. 2021 Dec 1;133(6):1577-1587. (PMID: 34543237)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e23930. (PMID: 33530193)
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Feb 1;41(2):81-108. (PMID: 37599617)
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Jun;28(3):264-77. (PMID: 21633252)
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Feb;126(2):445-457. (PMID: 33461725)
Anesthesiology. 2020 Feb;132(2):379-394. (PMID: 31939856)
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Aug 15;48(16):1127-1137. (PMID: 37195031)
Artif Intell Med. 2023 Aug;142:102588. (PMID: 37316101)
Anesthesiology. 2001 Jul;95(1):30-5. (PMID: 11465580)
Weitere Informationen
Background: General anesthesia comprises 3 essential components-hypnosis, analgesia, and immobility. Among these, maintaining an appropriate hypnotic state, or anesthetic depth, is crucial for patient safety. Excessively deep anesthesia may lead to hemodynamic instability and postoperative cognitive dysfunction, whereas inadequate anesthesia increases the risk of intraoperative awareness. Electroencephalography (EEG)-based monitoring has therefore become a cornerstone for evaluating anesthetic depth. However, processed electroencephalography (pEEG) indices remain vulnerable to various sources of interference, including electromyographic activity, interindividual variability, and anesthetic drug effects, which can yield inaccurate numerical outputs.
Objective: With recent advances in machine learning, particularly unsupervised learning, data-driven methods that classify signals according to inherent patterns offer new possibilities for anesthetic depth analysis. This study aimed to establish a methodology for automatically identifying anesthesia depth using an unsupervised, machine learning-based clustering approach applied to pEEG data.
Methods: Standard frontal EEG data from participants undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery were retrospectively analyzed, yielding more than 16,000 data points. The signals were filtered with a fourth-order Butterworth bandpass filter and transformed using the fast Fourier transform to estimate power spectral density. Normalized band power ratios for delta, high-theta, alpha, and beta frequencies were extracted as input features. Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering (c=3, m=2) was applied to categorize anesthetic depth into slight, proper, and deep clusters.
Results: FCM clustering successfully identified 3 physiologically interpretable clusters consistent with EEG dynamics during progressive anesthesia. As anesthesia deepened, frontal alpha oscillations became more prominent within a delta-dominant background, while beta activity decreased with loss of consciousness. The fuzzy membership values quantified transitional states and captured the continuum of anesthetic depth. Visualization confirmed strong correspondence among cluster transitions, Patient State Index trends, and spectral density patterns.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using unsupervised machine learning to enhance anesthetic depth assessment. By applying FCM clustering to pEEG data, this approach improves the understanding of anesthesia depth and integrates effectively with existing monitoring modalities. The proposed FCM-based method complements current EEG indices and may assist anesthesia practitioners and even nonanesthesia professionals in assessing anesthetic depth to enhance patient safety.
(© Po-Yu Huang, Wei-Lun Hong, Hui-Zen Hee, Wen-Kuei Chang, Ching-Hung Lee, Chien-Kun Ting. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org).)