Treffer: Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient-Experienced Continuity of Care Questionnaire (PECQ) Using Rasch Model.
“Ageing and Health [Internet],” World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health2023.
R. Baker, G. K. Freeman, J. L. Haggerty, M. J. Bankart, and K. H. Nockels, “Primary Medical Care Continuity and Patient Mortality: A Systematic Review,” British Journal of General Practice 70, no. 698 (2020): e600–e611.
World Health Organization, Realising the Potential of Primary Health Care: Lessons From COVID‐19 and Implications for the WHO European Region (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2022), https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2022-5173-44936-63926.
A. Kaehne, “Integration as a Scientific Paradigm,” Journal of Integrated Care 25, no. 4 (2017): 271–279.
L. Ljungholm, C. Klinga, A. Edin‐Liljegren, and M. Ekstedt, “What Matters in Care Continuity on the Chronic Care Trajectory for Patients and Family Carers?—A Conceptual Model,” Journal of Clinical Nursing 31, no. 9–10 (2022): 1327–1338.
P. Lytsy, S. Engström, M. Ekstedt, et al., “Outcomes Associated With Higher Relational Continuity in the Treatment of Persons With Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review,” eClinicalMedicine 49 (2022): 101492.
L. Ljungholm, K. Årestedt, C. Fagerström, I. Djukanovic, and M. Ekstedt, “Measuring Patients' Experiences of Continuity of Care in a Primary Care Context—Development and Evaluation of a Patient‐Reported Experience Measure,” Journal of Advanced Nursing 80, no. 1 (January 2024): 387–398.
L. R. Price, Psychometric Methods Theory Into Practice (The Guilford Press, 2016).
R. J. De Ayala, The Theory and Practice of Item Respons Theory, 2nd ed. (The Guilford Press, 2022).
J. F. Pallant and A. Tennant, “An Introduction to the Rasch Measurement Model: An Example Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS),” British Journal of Clinical Psychology 46, no. Pt 1 (2007): 1–18.
D. Andrich and I. Marais, A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory Measuring in the Educational, Social and Health Sciences, 1st ed. (Springer, 2019).
E. V. Smith Jr., “Detecting and Evaluating the Impact of Multidimensionality Using Item Fit Statistics and Principal Component Analysis of Residuals,” Journal of Applied Measurement 3, no. 2 (2002): 205–231.
P. Hagell, “Testing Rating Scale Unidimensionality Using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA)/t‐Test Protocol With the Rasch Model: The Primacy of Theory over Statistics,” Open Journal of Statistics 4 (2014): 456–465.
K. B. Christensen, G. Makransky, and M. Horton, “Critical Values for Yen's Q (3): Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations,” Applied Psychological Measurement 41, no. 3 (2017): 178–194.
A. Gadermann, M. Guhn, and B. Zumbo, “Estimating Ordinal Reliability for Likert‐Type and Ordinal Item Response Data: A Conceptual, Empirical, and Practical Guide,” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 17 (2012): 1–13.
T. A. Brown, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, 2nd ed. (The Guilford Press, 2015).
A. Tennant and A. A. Küçükdeveci, “Application of the Rasch Measurement Model in Rehabilitation Research and Practice: Early Developments, Current Practice, and Future Challenges,” Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 4 (2023): 1208670.
S. E. Stemler and A. Naples, “Rasch Measurement v. Item Response Theory: Knowing When to Cross the Line,” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 26, no. 11 (2021): 1–13, https://doi.org/10.7275/v2gd-4441.
G. T. Waterbury, “Missing Data and the Rasch Model: The Effects of Missing Data Mechanisms on Item Parameter Estimation,” Journal of Applied Measurement 20, no. 2 (2019): 154–166, https://www.researchgate.net/.
S. Soysal, Ç. Akın Arıkan, and H. Inal, Impact of Missing Data on Rasch Model Estimations [Internet] (ResearchGate, 2022), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313527087_Impact_Of_Missing_Data_On_Rasch_Model_Estimations.
C. Hohensinn and K. D. Kubinger, “On the Impact of Missing Values on Item Fit and the Model Validness of the Rasch Model,” Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling 53, no. 3 (2011): 380–393.
“Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [Internet],” World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, accessed October, 2024, https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/.
Weitere Informationen
Background: The Patient-Experienced Continuity of care Questionnaire (PECQ) was developed to measure continuity of care (CoC) in primary care, but has only been evaluated in accordance with classical test theory, which has some weaknesses compared with modern test theory.
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement properties of the PECQ using the Rasch model.
Method: Data for this psychometric study were collected using questionnaires administered to patients aged 18 years and older with one or more chronic conditions. Participants were consecutively recruited from 18 public primary care centres. The final sample comprised 324 patients (54% female and 46% male) with a mean age of 71.8 years (SD = 12).
Results: The PECQ demonstrated satisfactory measurement properties in terms of individual item fit, response category functioning, targeting and differential item functioning by age. Minor issues were identified regarding global model fit, local independence, reliability and non-uniform differential item functioning by sex.
Conclusions: Overall, the results show that PECQ has sound psychometric properties in adult patients with chronic disease and can be used to measure CoC in primary care settings.
Impact: This study addresses the need for accurate measurement of patient experiences of CoC, and the Rasch model was therefore used to evaluate the PECQ. As the instrument demonstrated good fit to the Rasch model, the findings have important implications for healthcare researchers, policymakers and practitioners. The PECQ provides a scientifically sound tool for evaluating CoC, enabling more accurate quality assessments and supporting targeted interventions in both Swedish and international primary care contexts where the instrument is adapted.
Patient or Public Contribution: Patients were actively involved in the study by participating in the cognitive validation of the questionnaire items. Their contributions helped ensure that the content was understandable, relevant and appropriately tailored to the target population. By providing feedback on the wording and content, the patients contributed to the development of a user-friendly and contextually grounded instrument, which was subsequently validated in this study using the Rasch model.
(© 2026 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)