Treffer: Compute units in OpenMP: Extensions for heterogeneous parallel programming.

Summary: This article evaluates the current support for heterogeneous OpenMP 5.2 applications regarding the simultaneous activation of host and device computing units (e.g., CPUs, GPUs, or FPGAs). The article identifies limitations in the current OpenMP specification and describes the design and implementation of novel OpenMP extensions and runtime support for heterogeneous parallel programming. The Compute Unit (CUs) abstraction is introduced in the OpenMP programming model. The Compute Unit abstraction is defined in terms of an aggregation of computing elements (e.g., CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs). On top of CUs, the article describes dynamic work sharing constructs and schedulers that address the inherent differences in compute power of host and device CUs. New constructs and the corresponding runtime support are described for the new abstractions. The article evaluates the case of a hybrid multilevel parallelization of the NPB‐MZ benchmark suite. The implementation exploits both coarse‐grain and fine‐grain parallelism, mapped to CUs of different nature (GPUs and CPUs). All CUs are activated using the new extensions and runtime support. We compare hybrid and nonhybrid executions under two state‐of‐the‐art work‐distribution schemes (Static and Dynamic Task schedulers). On a computing node composed of one AMD EPYC 7742 @ 2.250GHz (64 cores and 2 threads/core, totalling 128 threads per node) and 2×$$ \times $$ GPU AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 with 32GB, hybrid executions present speedups from 1.08×$$ \times $$ up to 3.18×$$ \times $$ with respect to a nonhybrid GPU implementation, depending on the number of activated CUs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Concurrency & Computation: Practice & Experience is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)