*Result*: Projective Hedging Algorithms for Multistage Stochastic Programming, Supporting Distributed and Asynchronous Implementation.

Title:
Projective Hedging Algorithms for Multistage Stochastic Programming, Supporting Distributed and Asynchronous Implementation.
Source:
Operations Research; Jan/Feb2025, Vol. 73 Issue 1, p311-324, 14p
Database:
Complementary Index

*Further Information*

*In "Projective Hedging Algorithms for Multistage Stochastic Programming, Supporting Distributed and Asynchronous Implementation," Eckstein, Watson, and Woodruff derive a new class of decomposition methods for convex multistage stochastic programs defined on finite but potentially large scenario trees. These methods resemble Rockafellar and Wets' now-classical progressive hedging (PH) method but are based on a flexible projective operator-splitting scheme instead of the standard alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). The new algorithms only need to reoptimize subproblems for a subset of the scenarios at each iteration, instead of all of them, and are also amenable to a form of asynchronous implementation, without the algorithm randomization or small step-size requirements usually imposed in such contexts. In the online appendix, the authors demonstrate significant computational gains over PH, applying hundreds or thousands of processor cores to problem instances with up to a million scenarios. We propose a decomposition algorithm for multistage stochastic programming that resembles the progressive hedging method of Rockafellar and Wets but is provably capable of several forms of asynchronous operation. We derive the method from a class of projective operator splitting methods fairly recently proposed by Combettes and Eckstein, significantly expanding the known applications of those methods. Our derivation assures convergence for convex problems whose feasible set is compact, subject to some standard regularity conditions and a mild "fairness" condition on subproblem selection. The method's convergence guarantees are deterministic and do not require randomization, in contrast to other proposed asynchronous variations of progressive hedging. Computational experiments described in an online appendix show the method to outperform progressive hedging on large-scale problems in a highly parallel computing environment. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Directorate of Computer and Information Science and Engineering [Grant CCF-1617617] and U.S. Department of Energy [Office of Electricity's Advanced Grid Modeling program]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.0228. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Operations Research is the property of INFORMS: Institute for Operations Research & the Management Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)*

*Full text is not displayed to guests*