*Result*: Computer-Based Tracking of Microsurgical Instruments: A Novel Assessment Tool for Robot-Assisted and Conventional Microsurgery.
Original Publication: Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins
Ghandourah HSH, Schols RM, Wolfs J, Altaweel F, van Mulken TJM. Robotic microsurgery in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a literature review. Surg Innov. 2023;30:607–614.
van Mulken TJM, Schols RM, Scharmga AMJ, et al.; MicroSurgical Robot Research Group. First-in-human robotic supermicrosurgery using a dedicated microsurgical robot for treating breast cancer-related lymphedema: a randomized pilot trial. Nat Commun. 2020;11:757.
von Reibnitz D, Weinzierl A, Barbon C, et al. 100 anastomoses: a two-year single-center experience with robotic-assisted micro- and supermicrosurgery for lymphatic reconstruction. J Robot Surg. 2024;18:164.
MMI Receives FDA Authorization to Commercialize Symani Surgical System in the U.S. Available at: https://www.mmimicro.com/symani-awarded-de-novo-authorization . Accessed July 23, 2024.
MMI Completes First Symani Clinical Cases in the U.S. Following FDA Commercial Authorization. Available at: https://www.mmimicro.com/mmi-completes-first-us-cases-with-symani . Accessed July 23, 2024.
Ballestin A, Malzone G, Menichini G, Lucattelli E, Innocenti M. New robotic system with wristed microinstruments allows precise reconstructive microsurgery: preclinical study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:7859–7867.
Barbon C, Grunherz L, Uyulmaz S, Giovanoli P, Lindenblatt N. Exploring the learning curve of a new robotic microsurgical system for microsurgery. JPRAS Open. 2022;34:126–133.
Wessel KJ, Stogner VA, Yu CT, et al. Preclinical performance of the combined application of two robotic systems in microsurgery: a two-center study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12:e5775.
Milling R, Carolan D, Pafitanis G, Quinlan C, Potter S. Microtools: a systematic review of validated assessment tools in microsurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022;75:4013–4022.
Chan W, Niranjan N, Ramakrishnan V. Structured assessment of microsurgery skills in the clinical setting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1329–1334.
Temple CLF, Ross DC. A new, validated instrument to evaluate competency in microsurgery: the University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Acquisition/Assessment instrument [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:215–222.
Satterwhite T, Son J, Carey J, et al. The Stanford Microsurgery and Resident Training (SMaRT) scale: validation of an on-line global rating scale for technical assessment. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:S84–S88.
Pafitanis G, Veljanoski D, Ghanem AM, Myers S. Intimal surface suture line (end-product) assessment of end-to-side microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1409.
Kim E, Norman ICF, Myers S, Singh M, Ghanem A. The end game: a quantitative assessment tool for anastomosis in simulated microsurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020;73:1116–1121.
Ezra DG, Aggarwal R, Michaelides M, et al. Skills acquisition and assessment after a microsurgical skills course for ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:257–262.
Applebaum MA, Doren EL, Ghanem AM, Myers SR, Harrington M, Smith DJ. Microsurgery competency during plastic surgery residency: an objective skills assessment of an integrated residency training program. Eplasty. 2018;18:e25.
Stenmark M, Omerbasic E, Magnusson M, Andersson V, Abrahamsson M, Tran PK. Vision-based tracking of surgical motion during live open-heart surgery. J Surg Res. 2022;271:106–116.
Sugiyama T, Sugimori H, Tang M, et al. Deep learning-based video-analysis of instrument motion in microvascular anastomosis training. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024;166:6.
Nema S, Vachhani L. Surgical instrument detection and tracking technologies: automating dataset labeling for surgical skill assessment. Front Robot AI. 2022;9:1030846.
Struebing F, Bigdeli A, Weigel J, et al. Robot-assisted microsurgery: lessons learned from 50 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12:e5685.
Savastano A, Rizzo S. A novel microsurgical robot: preliminary feasibility test in ophthalmic field. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022;11:13.
Malzone G, Menichini G, Innocenti M, Ballestin A. Microsurgical robotic system enables the performance of microvascular anastomoses: a randomized in vivo preclinical trial. Sci Rep. 2023;13:14003.
*Further Information*
*Background: Efficient and objective tools for self-assessment of microsurgical skills are needed to ensure high-quality microsurgical training and optimized use of surgeons' time and resources. In addition, the successful clinical integration of microsurgical robots in operating rooms will critically depend on effective training and evaluation strategies for microsurgeons, necessitating the development, usability testing, and validation of such assessment tools for both conventional and robotically assisted microsurgery.
Methods: Two deep convolutional neural network-based computer algorithms were developed to enable automated tracking of conventional and robotic microsurgical instruments. To train these models, supervised and semisupervised learning was applied to 84 microsurgical training videos, and the results were statistically analyzed using t tests, ANOVA, linear regression, and correlation analyses.
Results: Computer algorithms that automatically track conventional and robotic microinstruments in recorded microsurgical training videos were developed. The total trajectory length showed a positive correlation with procedure time and Structured Assessment of Microsurgical Skill scores, reflecting operative efficiency and flow. Both procedure time and total trajectory length of robot-assisted procedures were significantly longer among experienced microsurgeons compared with the conventional approach, but not among microsurgical beginners. The mean deviation intensity, quantifying hand tremor throughout microsurgical performances, was significantly lower with the robot-assisted compared with the conventional microsurgical approach across all experience levels.
Conclusions: The proposed computer algorithms address critical gaps in objective microsurgical skill assessment, enabling accessible, efficient, and quantitative self-evaluation, and allow for direct comparison of robot-assisted and conventional microsurgical performances.
(Copyright © 2025 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)*