*Result*: Multitasking Tug-of-War: Exploring the Impact of Task Modality, Task Load Level, and Task Load Type on Dual-Task Interference in Virtual Reality.

Title:
Multitasking Tug-of-War: Exploring the Impact of Task Modality, Task Load Level, and Task Load Type on Dual-Task Interference in Virtual Reality.
Authors:
El Iskandarani M; University of Virginia, USA., Bolton M; University of Virginia, USA., Riggs SL; University of Virginia, USA.
Source:
Human factors [Hum Factors] 2026 Apr; Vol. 68 (4), pp. 519-539. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Nov 23.
Publication Type:
Journal Article
Language:
English
Journal Info:
Publisher: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0374660 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1547-8181 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00187208 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Hum Factors Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):
Publication: Santa Monica, Ca : Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Original Publication: New York, N.Y. : Pergamon Press, 1958-4
Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: dual-tasking; human performance; human–computer interaction; immersive environments; multimodal displays; multiple resource theory; virtual reality
Entry Date(s):
Date Created: 20251123 Date Completed: 20260223 Latest Revision: 20260223
Update Code:
20260223
DOI:
10.1177/00187208251396766
PMID:
41275488
Database:
MEDLINE

*Further Information*

*ObjectiveThe present work investigates how task modality (visual, auditory), task load level (low or high), and task load type (target-distractor similarity, display rate) influence dual-task interference in virtual reality (VR).BackgroundDual-task interference is influenced by various factors including perceptual modality, where tasks that share the same modality may yield larger performance decrements than tasks that do not. Task load (i.e., level and type) can also reduce performance in one or both tasks. However, the interaction between these factors in immersive environments like VR is still unclear.MethodParticipants performed a: (a) visual tracking task, (b) visual/auditory detection task, or (c) both concurrently in two different experiments. In Experiment 1, visual tracking load was manipulated via increasing target-distractor similarity, while detection load was manipulated via increasing display rate. In Experiment 2, detection load was manipulated by increasing target-distractor similarity.ResultsIn Experiment 1, higher detection task loads induced greater dual-task costs (DTC) in the detection task regardless of task modality, whereas tracking task DTC was not influenced by higher task loads. In Experiment 2, higher detection task loads induced greater DTC in the detection task only when it was presented visually.ConclusionThe findings suggest that tasks presented in the same modality may experience greater dual-task interference in one or both tasks depending on the task load level and type.ApplicationThese findings can inform the design of multimodal interfaces in complex multitasking environments like military operations or emergency response where minimizing dual-task interference at varying workloads is crucial.*

*Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.*