*Result*: A Clash of Epistemic Tools: Computer Programming and Paper-and-Pencil in Secondary School Mathematics Problem Solving

Title:
A Clash of Epistemic Tools: Computer Programming and Paper-and-Pencil in Secondary School Mathematics Problem Solving
Language:
English
Source:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2025 23(5):1259-1282.
Availability:
Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed:
Y
Page Count:
24
Publication Date:
2025
Document Type:
*Academic Journal* Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
Education Level:
Secondary Education
DOI:
10.1007/s10763-024-10512-z
ISSN:
1571-0068
1573-1774
Entry Date:
2025
Accession Number:
EJ1472159
Database:
ERIC

*Further Information*

*Much attention has been paid to computational thinking (CT) as a problem-solving approach across various curricula, particularly in mathematics. Most studies solely used a digital instrument or examined transfer of program solving ability, neglecting the mathematics knowledge domain or how the novel digital instrument functions alongside the dominant paper-and-pencil instrument in a classroom. Using Instrument-Mediated Activity Theory, our qualitative case study compares how secondary level students appropriated computer programming (as a means of using CT) and paper-and-pencil instruments to solve mathematics textbook word problems, via the analysis of three cases. Our results show that each instrument privileged certain ways of thinking that, by extension, de-emphasized others. The finding implies that teachers seeking to introduce computational concepts should be aware of an epistemic clash arising from the long-term use of paper-and-pencil for solving mathematics problems. We suggest that a more effective way to bring CT into secondary level mathematics is to introduce new types of problems or tasks that are less likely to interfere with the dominant instrument.*

*As Provided*